3
$\begingroup$

In Gallian's Abstract Algebra, $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{d}]$ is defined as the ring

$$ \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{d}] = \{a+b\sqrt{d}, a,b\in \mathbb{Z}\}, $$

where $d$ is required to not be divisible by the square of any prime. Why? What would happen to this ring is if $d$ was divisible by the square of some prime?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ In your case $√d$ is irrational. $\endgroup$
    – Avinash N
    Oct 24, 2018 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ What would happen to this ring? Say, we have $d=p^2$. Then $d=1$ gives the same ring. In general, it is convenient to assume that $d$ is squarefree. $\endgroup$ Oct 24, 2018 at 19:42

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

We enlarge $R = \Bbb Z[\sqrt{a^2d}]$ to $\,\Bbb Z[\sqrt d]\,$ because the larger ring might enjoy unique factorizarion, whereas $R$ never does when $\,a> 1.\,$ Indeed $\,w = \sqrt{a^2d}/a\not\in R$ is a $\rm\color{#c00}{proper\ fraction}$ over $R$ but $\,w^2 = (a^2d)/a^2 = d\in R,\,$ so $\,w\,$ is a root of the $\rm\color{#c00}{monic}$ polynomial $\,x^2-d\in R[x].\,$ This implies that unique factorization fails in $R$ because RRT = Rational Root Test fails, but RRT is true in any unique factorization domain (with same proof as in $\Bbb Z)$, i.e. UFDs, being gcd domains, are integrally closed.

So if there is any hope of achieving a nice divisibility theory like unique factorization then we need to adjoin all of the fractions that are roots of monic polynomials. Doing so yields what is known as the integral closure of the domain (in its fraction field), because it arises by adjoining all elements that are integral over the domain (roots of monic polynomials over it).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ See also here. $\endgroup$ Sep 24, 2020 at 4:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.