1
$\begingroup$

Let $T: \Bbb{R}^n \rightarrow \Bbb{R}^n$ be an invertible linear transformation. Prove that if {${ \vec{v_1},\vec{v_2},...,\vec{v_n}}$} is a linearly independent set of $\Bbb{R}^n$ if and only if {$T( \vec{v}_1),T( \vec{v_2}),...,T( \vec{v_k})$} is a linearly independent set of $\Bbb{R}^n$.

So I know that for a set of vectors to be linearly independent then they cannot be written as a linear combination of one another. So can I say something along the lines of $t_1 v_1 + t_2 v_2 + ... + t_k v_k = 0$ then taking the transformations the set I get is {$T( t_1 \vec{v}_1),T( t_2 \vec{v_2}),...,T( t_k \vec{v_k})$} which given the definition of linear independence can be written as $ t_1 T( \vec{v}_1) + t_2 T( \vec{v_2}) +,..., + t_k T( \vec{v_k}) = 0$. So then is that it?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. You have the right line of thinking. Be careful:you've only shown that a linear combination in the domain implies a linear combination in the range. You may want to remark why none of the images T(v$_i$) can be 0 in this situation. Otherwise, a non-trivial solution may map to a trivial solution if certain images are 0. $\endgroup$ – Joel Pereira Oct 22 '18 at 4:14
3
$\begingroup$

For $\Longrightarrow$ : You are on the right way!

$t_1T(v_1)+t_2T(v_2)+\cdots+t_nT(v_n)=0 $ implies $$T(t_1v_1+\cdots+t_nv_n)=0=T(0)$$ and so by one-one of $T$, $$t_1v_1+\cdots+t_nv_n=0$$

and by independence of $v_i$, $$t_1=t_2=\cdots=t_n=0$$


For $\Longleftarrow$ : Let $\alpha_1v_1+\alpha_2v_2+\cdots+\alpha_nv_n=0$ and apply $T$ on both sides and use independence of $T(v_i)$'s to get the result!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.