6
$\begingroup$

So basically, I am given the following to prove:

Let $+\gamma$ be a positively oriented smooth Jordan arc, and let $\omega$ denote the interior of $+\gamma$. Recall that if $F = (F_1, F_2):D \to \mathbb{R}^2$ is a continuously differentiable vector field in an open set $D$ containing $\omega \cup(+\gamma)$, then

$$\iint_\omega \left(\frac{\partial F_2}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial F_1}{\partial y}\right) dxdy = \oint_{+\gamma}F \cdot \overrightarrow{ds} $$ where the right hand-side is the line-integral of $F$ along the path $+\gamma$.

By suitably choosing $F$, prove that $$ \DeclareMathOperator{\Area}{Area} \DeclareMathOperator{\diameter}{diameter} \DeclareMathOperator{\length}{length} 2\Area(\omega) \leq \diameter(+\gamma) \length(+\gamma)$$ where

$\diameter(+\gamma) = \sup\{|z(s)-z(t)| : s,t \in [a,b]\}$ and $\length(+\gamma) = \int_{a}^{b} |z'(t)| dt$.

The only thing I know so far is that I need to find an $F$ such that $\frac{\partial F_2}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial F_1}{\partial y} =1$ because then $$\iint_{\omega} dxdy = \Area(\omega).$$ However, I do not know where to proceed from there!

$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

I assume that $z$ is $\gamma$ in the definition of $\operatorname{diameter}(+\gamma)$. Without loss of generality, we can assume that $\gamma(a)=(0,0)$ (otherwise, we can translate $\gamma$ until the point $\gamma(a)$ hits the origin).

I would take $\vec{F}=(F_1,F_2)$ with $F_1=-y$ and $F_2=x$, so that $$\frac{\partial F_2}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial F_1}{\partial y}=2.$$ By Green's theorem, we have $$2\operatorname{Area}(\omega)=\iint_\omega \left(\frac{\partial F_2}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial F_1}{\partial y}\right)\ dx\ dy=\oint_{+\gamma}\vec{F}\cdot \vec{dr}.$$ Hence, $$2\operatorname{Area}(\omega)\leq \oint_{+\gamma}\left\vert\vec{F}\cdot \vec{dr}\right\vert\leq \oint_{+\gamma}\left\Vert\vec{F}\right\Vert\ dr.$$ Because $\left\Vert\vec{F}\right\Vert\leq \operatorname{diameter}(+\gamma)$, we conclude that $$2\operatorname{Area}(\omega)\leq \oint_{+\gamma}\operatorname{diameter}(+\gamma)\ dr=\operatorname{diameter}(+\gamma)\oint_{+\gamma}dr=\operatorname{diameter}(+\gamma)\operatorname{length}(+\gamma).$$


This inequality is a quite weak. If we define $\operatorname{radius}(+\gamma)$ to be $$\inf\Big\{r>0:\exists p\in\mathbb{R}^2,\ \forall u\in[a,b],\ \big\vert\gamma(u)-p\big\vert< r\Big\}\,,$$ then we have $$2\operatorname{Area}(\omega)\leq \operatorname{radius}(+\gamma)\operatorname{length}(+\gamma).$$ The equality holds iff $\gamma$ traces a circle (once). You can use Jung's theorem to show that $$2\operatorname{Area}(\omega)\leq \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\operatorname{diameter}(+\gamma)\operatorname{length}(+\gamma),$$ which is stronger than the required result, but is still weak. So, it is an interesting question to find the infimum $\lambda_{\min}$ of all $\lambda>0$ such that $$\operatorname{Area}(\omega)\leq \lambda\operatorname{diameter}(+\gamma)\operatorname{length}(+\gamma).$$ We already know that $\lambda_{\min} \leq \frac1{2\sqrt{3}}$.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ In the case where $\gamma$ is a loop based at the origin $\lvert F \rvert \leq \mathrm{diam}(\gamma)$. How can you be sure that this is true for a general loop? $\endgroup$
    – Gibbs
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 14:20
  • $\begingroup$ @Gibbs I don't understand the question. Can you elaborate? $\endgroup$
    – user593746
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 14:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Did you miss the assumption that I made in the first paragraph, namely that I assumed the origin lies in the image of $\gamma$? $\endgroup$
    – user593746
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 14:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We have practically the same solution. I don't see why translating $\gamma$ is worse than translating $F$. $\endgroup$
    – user593746
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 14:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To each his own, but I think assuming that $\gamma$ passing through the origin makes it quite easy to see that $\left\Vert\vec{F}\right\Vert\leq \operatorname{diameter}(+\gamma)$. $\endgroup$
    – user593746
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 14:38
2
$\begingroup$

Choose $F(x,y) = (-y+y(a),x-x(a))$ and define a $1$-form $\alpha := (x-x(a))\mathrm{d}y+(y(a)-y)\mathrm{d}x = F_2(x,y)\mathrm{d}y+F_1(x,y)\mathrm{d}x$. Then $$\mathrm{d}\alpha = 2\mathrm{d}x \wedge \mathrm{d}y$$ and so $$\int_{\omega} \mathrm{d}\alpha= \int_{\omega}\left(\frac{\partial F_2}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial F_1}{\partial y}\right) \mathrm{d}x\mathrm{d}y= 2\int_{\omega} \mathrm{d}x \wedge \mathrm{d}y = 2\mathrm{Area}(\omega). $$ By Stokes theorem (which reduces exactly to the curl theorem you are recalling in this case), you also get \begin{align} \int_{\omega} \mathrm{d}\alpha &= \int_{\partial \omega} \alpha = \int_{\gamma+} \alpha\\ &= \int_a^b (x(t)-x(a))y'(t)+(y(a)-y(t))x'(t)\,\mathrm{d}t = \int_a^b \langle F(x,y),(x'(t),y'(t))\rangle\,\mathrm{d}t, \end{align} where $\langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle$ denotes the dot product. By Cauchy-Schwarz inequality you get \begin{align} \int_a^b \langle F(x,y),(x'(t),y'(t))\rangle\,\mathrm{d}t & \leq \int_a^b \sqrt{(x(t)-x(a))^2+(y(t)-y(a))^2}\sqrt{x'(t)^2+y'(t)^2}\, \mathrm{d}t \\ & \leq \mathrm{diameter}(\omega)\int_a^b \lvert z'(t)\rvert \, \mathrm{d}t\\ &\leq \mathrm{diameter}(\omega)\mathrm{length}(\gamma+). \end{align}

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .