How are the complex numbers $z_1$ and $z_2$ related if $\arg(z_1) = \arg(z_2)$?

My attempt :
Let $z_1$,$z_2\in \mathbb{C}$ such that $z_1=r_1(\cos\theta + i\sin\theta)=a+ib$ and $z_2=r_2(\cos\gamma+i\sin\gamma)=c+id$

Then, we have $\arg(z_1)=tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a})$ and $\arg(z_2)=tan^{-1}(\frac{d}{c})$

As $\arg(z_1)=\arg(z_2)$ then $\tan^{-1}(\frac{b}{a})=\tan^{-1}(\frac{d}{c})\implies \frac{b}{a}=\frac{d}{c}\implies b.c=a.d$

This is correct, i have serious doubt about the interpretation of this. Can someone help me?

  • $\begingroup$ You know the argument can be determined just up to an integer multiple of $\;2\pi\;$ radians, so... $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Oct 13 '18 at 16:22

It is known that $\arg\left(\frac{z_1}{z_2}\right)=\arg(z_1)-\arg(z_2)$, so this is equal to zero as $\arg(z_1)=\arg(z_2)$; so as $\frac{z_1}{z_2}$ has argument 0, it is a positive real number, so $z_1=kz_2$ for some positive real $k$.

  • $\begingroup$ Oh.... Okay, now i understand. Thanks for all! $\endgroup$ – Bvss12 Oct 13 '18 at 16:34
  • $\begingroup$ One question, if $\frac{z_1}{z_2}$ have argument $0$ then $\frac{z_1}{z_2}=\frac{r_1}{r_2}\cos(\theta_1-\theta_2)$ no? then $k=\frac{r_1}{r_2}\cos(\theta_1-\theta_2)$ $\endgroup$ – Bvss12 Oct 13 '18 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, and $\theta_1-\theta_2=0$. $\endgroup$ – Benedict Randall Shaw Oct 13 '18 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ $\theta_1 - \theta_2$ is a multiple of $2\pi$ and $\cos(2n\pi) = 0$. $\endgroup$ – Trevor Gunn Oct 13 '18 at 16:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Trevor Gunn It was funny because until now I thought $\cos (2n\pi)=1$ ..... :-) Just kidding, might be a typo!! Cheers!!! $\endgroup$ – Rohan Shinde Oct 13 '18 at 16:54

The whole purpose of the argument function is that if $z = re^{i\theta}$ then we have the absolute value function for $r$ (that is, $r = |z|$) and the argument function gives us $\theta = \arg(z)$ modulo a multiple of $2\pi$. But in any case we have

$$ e^{i\theta} = e^{i\arg(z)}. $$

Thus $z = |z|e^{i \arg(z)}$.

The purpose of writing the argument function in terms of the arctangent is to convert from cartesian coordinates ($a + bi$) to polar coordinates. But it's not exactly $\arctan(b/a)$, it's

$$ \arg(a + bi) = \arctan(a,b) = \begin{cases} \arctan(b/a) & \text{if } (a,b) \in \text{ quadrants I or IV} \\ \arctan(b/a) + \pi & \text{if } (a,b) \in \text{ quadrants II or III} \\ \end{cases} $$

Because, for example, $\arctan(\frac{-1}{-1}) = \arctan{\frac{1}{1}} = \frac{\pi}4$ even though the points $-1 - i$ and $1 + i$ are 180 degrees apart.


A good way to see it is that $\cos\theta+i\sin\theta=\cos\gamma+i\sin\gamma$. So, if you put $k=r_2/r_1$, you get that $z_2=kz_1$: $$ z_2=r_2 (\cos\theta+i\theta)=kr_1(\cos\theta+i\theta)=kz_1. $$

  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand... Why you say $z_1=z_2$? $\endgroup$ – Bvss12 Oct 13 '18 at 16:29
  • $\begingroup$ I don't. There's a $k $. $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami Oct 13 '18 at 16:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.