I would like to know if anyone has an ideea if the following statement is true. For any sequence of consecutive positive integerers $(n_0, n_0+1,..., n_0+k).$ Where $n_0 \ge 1, k\ge 0,$ but $k\ge 1$ if $n_0 = 0$ (so different from the sequence (1)). There exists a prime number p that divides only one number in the sequence.

For example in the sequence (14, 15, 16) 7 divides only one of them, it doesn't have to be unique as 5 also divides only one of them.

A few restrictions that I managed to find for a counter-example to exist:

  • The sequence cannot contain a prime number, otherwise it will also contain a largest prime number and that prime will only divide itself.
  • k has to be smaller than $2\times n_0,$ otherwise the sequence will contain a prime number.
  • The number of elements in the sequence (i.e. $k+1$) cannot be a prime number, otherwise that prime will only divide one number.

I made a simple computer program to check for such a sequence and couldn't find any in all possible sequences for up to $n_0 = 200000.$


If $n_0 > k+1$ we have Sylvester's Theorem (see here, see here for the original paper by Sylvester and see here for a proof by Erdős), which states that $n_0(n_0 + 1) \cdots (n_0 + k)$ is divisible by a prime $p$ bigger than $k+1$, so that exactly one element of our sequence is divisible by $p$. For $n_0 \le k+1$ we have a prime $p$ with $n_0 \le \left \lceil(n_0 + k)/2 \right\rceil < p \le n_0 + k$ by Bertrand's Postulate and no other integer in the sequence can be divisible by $p$, since $2p > n_0 + k$.

  • $\begingroup$ Great answer! Can you please add the link to Sylvester's Theorem to your answer so that everything's in the same place? $\endgroup$ – Carl Schildkraut Oct 11 '18 at 13:33
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for the answer ! Would you happen to have a demonstration for Sylvester's Theorem. He has few of them but didn't manage to find anything about it. $\endgroup$ – Catalin Voiculet Oct 11 '18 at 20:09
  • $\begingroup$ I have added a link to Sylvester's paper from 1892. It is not easy by any means, but I find his writing style beautiful! $\endgroup$ – Woett Oct 11 '18 at 21:55

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.