4
$\begingroup$

On a Remiannian manifold M, the Hessian of a smooth function $f$ on M is defined to be:

$$\operatorname{Hess}f=\frac{1}{2}\mathcal L_{\nabla f}(g)$$

where $\mathcal L$ stands for Lie derivative, $g$ is the metric of the manifold, and $\nabla f$ means the divergence of the function. It is said that Hessian is a symmetry tensor, but I am not sure why it's symmetric.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ It's just a non-Euclidean generalisation of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hessian_matrix $\endgroup$ – J.G. Oct 10 '18 at 14:24
  • $\begingroup$ do you mean gradient by divergence? $\endgroup$ – peter Feb 20 '20 at 19:25
0
$\begingroup$

There is a more general property at play here that is worth noting: if $\varphi : M \to N$ is a diffeomorphism of smooth manifolds, then the pullback map $\varphi^{*} : T^k N \to T^k M$ on bundles of covariant k-tensors will preserve symmetric and anti-symmetric properties of your covariant k-tensors.

For example, consider the case when $g$ is a symmetric covariant 2-tensor on $N$, i.e., $g$ is a Riemannian metric on $N$. Then the pullback $\varphi^{*}g$ becomes a Riemannian metric on $M$ defined on vector fields $X, Y \in \chi\left(M\right)$ by $$ \varphi^{*}g \left(X, Y\right) := g\left(\varphi_{*}X, \varphi_{*}Y\right). $$ Note that from the symmetry of $g$ on $N$ it follows that \begin{align*} \varphi^{*}g \left(X, Y\right) &= g\left(\varphi_{*}X, \varphi_{*}Y\right)\\ &=g\left(\varphi_{*}Y, \varphi_{*}X\right)\\ &=\varphi^{*}g\left(Y, X\right). \end{align*}

And more to the point of your question, this implies that the symmetric or anti-symmetric properties of a covariant k-tensor are preserved under Lie derivatives. For example, suppose now that $g$ is a symmetric covariant $k$-tensor on $M$, that $X$ is a vector field on $M$, and $\psi_{t}$ is the flow of $X$ (i.e., the one-parameter family of diffeomorphisms of $M$ generated by $X$).

Then by definition we have that the Lie derivative of $g$ at a point $p \in M$ in the direction of $X$ is $$ \left(\mathcal{L}_{X}g\right)_{p} = \lim\limits_{t \to 0} \frac{\left(\psi^{*}_{t}\right)_{p}\left(g_{\psi_{t}\left(p\right)}\right) - g_{p}}{t}. $$

The numerator of the above expression is merely the difference between the pullback of the symmetric tensor $g$ at $\psi_{t}(p)$ to $p$ and the symmetric tensor $g$ at $p$. But since pullbacks of diffeomorphisms preserve symmetry properties of tensors, the numerator is the difference between symmetric tensors at $p \in M$ and is thus symmetric. The resulting Lie derivative will thus be symmetric as well.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Note that, for any vector fields $X,Y\in\mathcal{T}(M)$, \begin{align*} &(\mathcal{L}_{\nabla f}g)(X,Y)\\ =&\mathcal{L}_{\nabla f}(g(X,Y))-g(\mathcal{L}_{\nabla f}X,Y)-g(X,\mathcal{L}_{\nabla f}Y)\\ =&\mathcal{L}_{\nabla f}(g(Y,X))-g(\mathcal{L}_{\nabla f}Y,X)-g(Y,\mathcal{L}_{\nabla f}X)\\ =&(\mathcal{L}_{\nabla f}g)(Y,X) \end{align*} by symmetry of $g$, so $\mathrm{Hess}\,f$ is indeed a symmetric $(0,2)$ tensor. Here I used the formula $$(\mathcal{L}_V\omega)(X_1,\dots,X_n)=\mathcal{L}_V(\omega(X_1,\dots,X_n))-\omega(\mathcal{L}_V X_1,\dots,X_n)-\dots-\omega(X_1,\dots,\mathcal{L}_VX_n)$$ where $\omega$ is a tensor field, and $V,X_1,\dots,X_n$ are vector fields.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.