0
$\begingroup$

I have seen the statement that the direct product of groups $G_1\otimes G_2 \otimes … \otimes G_N$ is identical to the direct sum of groups $G_1\oplus G_2 \oplus … \oplus G_N$ for finite $N$.

What is the intuition about this being true?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Direct product is usually denoted by $\times$ while $\otimes$ usually stands for tensor product. $\endgroup$ – Yanko Oct 8 '18 at 20:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's true for Abelian groups only. (Or.. what is the direct sum of noncommutative groups?) $\endgroup$ – Berci Oct 8 '18 at 20:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Berci : direct sum is defined for any family of groups, in the same way as for abelian groups : it's the subgroup of the product where all but finitely many coordinates are $1$ (with multiplicative notation). It's simply not a coproduct, but it still exists $\endgroup$ – Max Oct 9 '18 at 7:31
1
$\begingroup$

It's basically the fact that finite coproducts and products coincide in the category of Abelian groups.

There's a deep connection of these coincidences with addition, as discussed here in details.
Briefly, for any category with zero morphisms:

There (naturally) is a commutative monoid structure ('addition') on the set of morphisms $A\to B$ for any objects $A,B\ $ iff$\ $ finite coproducts and products coincide

Now, pointwise addition of homomorphisms $f,g:A\to B$ produces again a homomorphism $A\to B\ $ (if $B$ is commutative), and thus it gives rise to a commutative monoid structure (with inverses, i.e. an Abelian group).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.