If $\phi:A\to B(H)$ is a $*$ homomorphism, do there exist two different $*$ homomorphisms $\phi_1,\phi_2:M(A)\to B(H)$ which extend $\phi$, where $M(A)$ is the multiplier algebra of $A$?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Interesting. I think a counterexample might lie in the case $A=K(H)$ and $\phi:K(H)\to B(H)$ is the inclusion. It is known that $M(K(H))$ is equal to $B(H)$, so to find a counterexample it would suffice to show that if $\phi:B(H)\to B(H)$ is a $*$-homomorphism which fixes $K(H)$, then $\phi$ must be the identity morphism. $\endgroup$ – Aweygan Oct 4 '18 at 0:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Aweygan: no such thing exists. Any completely positive map that fixes $K(H)$, fixes $B(H)$; that's (a particular case of) Arveson's Boundary Theorem. It can also be seen via Hamana's notion of rigidity. $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami Oct 4 '18 at 1:42
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin Would you like to post this as an answer? $\endgroup$ – Aweygan Oct 4 '18 at 2:09
  • $\begingroup$ I have actually just posted an actual answer (which is a bit easier since we are dealing with representations and not just cp maps). $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami Oct 4 '18 at 2:35

The extension is unique if $\phi$ is non-degenerate (i.e., if $\phi(A)H$ is dense). Proof below. If $\phi$ is degenerate, the extension is not unique. For instance let $A=c_0(\mathbb N)$, and $\phi:A\to B(\ell^2(\mathbb N))\oplus\mathbb C$, with $\phi(x)=(x,0)$. Here $M(A)=\ell^\infty(\mathbb N)$. Let $\phi_1:M(A)\to B(\ell^2(\mathbb N))\oplus\mathbb C$ be $\phi_1(x)=(x,0)$; for $\phi_2$, fix a free ultrafilter $\omega$, and let $\phi_2(x)=(x,\lim_{n\to\omega}x(n))$

The proof in the non-degenerate case:

If $J\subset A$ is an ideal, then any non-degenerate $*$-homomorphism $\pi:J\to B(H)$ extends uniquely to $A$. This answers the question in the negative, since $A$ is an (essential) ideal in $M(A)$.

Given $a\in A$, define $\tilde\pi(a)$ by (for $b\in J$, $h\in H$) $$\tag1 \tilde\pi(a)\pi(b)h=\pi(ab)h. $$ This is well-defined: if $\pi(b_1)h_1=\pi(b_2)h_2$, then taking an approximate unit $\{e_j\}$ for $J$, $$ \pi(ab_1)h_1=\lim_j\pi(ae_jb_1)h_1=\lim_j\pi(ae_j)\pi(b_1)h_1 =\lim_j\pi(ae_j)\pi(b_2)h_2=\pi(ab_2)h_2. $$ Also, \begin{align} \|\tilde\pi(a)\pi(b)h\|&=\|\pi(ab)h\|=\lim_j\|\pi(ae_j)\pi(b)h\|\leq\|a\|\,\|\pi(b)h\|. \end{align} This shows that $\tilde\pi(a)$ is bounded on $\pi(J)H$, and so we extend it uniquely to $\overline{\pi(J)H}$. With similar ideas, one proves that $\tilde\pi$ is a $*$-homomorphism.

For the uniqueness, assume that $\rho:M(A)\to B(H)$ is a representation such that $\rho|_A=\pi|_A$. Then $$ \rho(a)\pi(b)h=\rho(a)\rho(b)h=\rho(ab)h=\pi(ab)h=\tilde\pi(a)\pi(b)h. $$ Thus $\rho(a)$ and $\tilde\pi(a)$ agree on a dense subset of $H$ and are thus equal.

  • $\begingroup$ I saw your question, but I don't know the answer. $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami Oct 4 '18 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ Pro Argerami, I checked the proof,I can only conclude that $\rho(A)K^\perp\subset K^\perp$.How to deduce that $\rho(A)H\subset K$? $\endgroup$ – math112358 Apr 28 at 8:41
  • $\begingroup$ You are right. I realized that you have no uniqueness when the representation is degenerate. I have edited the answer. $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami Apr 28 at 14:38
  • $\begingroup$ I have another doubt.Suppose $A$ is non-unital and we have a unital $*$homomorphism $\pi:M(A)\to B(H)$,then we can obtain a representation $\pi_A:A\to B(H)$ by restricting $\pi$ to A.Can we conclude that there is only one extension $\pi$ of M(A) which extends $\pi_A$? $\endgroup$ – math112358 Apr 28 at 16:34
  • $\begingroup$ No. You can have $\pi|_A=0$; in fact, you can have different such representations. For instance with $c_0$ as above, you can take two different representations of $\ell^\infty$ that are $0$ on $c_0$. $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami Apr 28 at 17:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.