2
$\begingroup$

The question is straight forward:

Is there a standard terminology for a category whose objects are all free? (defined by the universal property)

The prime example I had in mind was the category of $\Bbbk$-vector spaces, but I think for any algebraic structure, the subcategory consisting of the free objects would be interesting to consider.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2925813/… $\endgroup$ – Musa Al-hassy Sep 28 '18 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ I asked this as a side question here once, and got some suggestions (my favorite was "panteleutheric"), but nothing standard. It's a very special property, as I learned in the answer to my question. $\endgroup$ – tcamps Sep 30 '18 at 23:44
3
$\begingroup$

The notion of a "free object" doesn't make sense in an arbitrary category. Note that the universal property of e.g. free groups refers to maps from a set to the underlying set of a group. So you should have something like a forgetful functor to the category of sets in order to talk about "free objects".

If you're looking at a category of algebraic structures, in the sense of the category of algebras for a monad $T$, then the subcategory of free algebras is (equivalent to) the Kleisli category of $T$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ True, I wanted to specify to talk about concrete category. Yes, I think this is what I'm looking for. Thank you! $\endgroup$ – G. Chiusole Sep 28 '18 at 16:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.