2
$\begingroup$

The question is straight forward:

Is there a standard terminology for a category whose objects are all free? (defined by the universal property)

The prime example I had in mind was the category of $\Bbbk$-vector spaces, but I think for any algebraic structure, the subcategory consisting of the free objects would be interesting to consider.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2925813/… $\endgroup$ Sep 28, 2018 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ I asked this as a side question here once, and got some suggestions (my favorite was "panteleutheric"), but nothing standard. It's a very special property, as I learned in the answer to my question. $\endgroup$
    – tcamps
    Sep 30, 2018 at 23:44

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The notion of a "free object" doesn't make sense in an arbitrary category. Note that the universal property of e.g. free groups refers to maps from a set to the underlying set of a group. So you should have something like a forgetful functor to the category of sets in order to talk about "free objects".

If you're looking at a category of algebraic structures, in the sense of the category of algebras for a monad $T$, then the subcategory of free algebras is (equivalent to) the Kleisli category of $T$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ True, I wanted to specify to talk about concrete category. Yes, I think this is what I'm looking for. Thank you! $\endgroup$ Sep 28, 2018 at 16:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .