Which is the correct one?

Here is an excerpt from the book 'Applied Numerical Linear Algebra' by James W. Demmel from SIAM

But I have done it slightly different taking $$\hat{l}_{ij}$$ and $$\hat{u}_{ij}$$ and ended up getting $$|{E}_{ij}|\leq n\epsilon_m(|\hat L|\cdot |\hat U|)_{ij}.$$

$$A\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$$
Also $$\hat{A}=\hat{L}\hat{U}$$ and $$E=\hat{A}-A$$.
The $$LU$$ decomposition is performed using the following equations : \begin{alignat*}{3} & & l_{ij} & =\dfrac{a_{ij}-\sum_{k=1}^{j-1}l_{ik}u_{kj}}{u_{jj}}\qquad i>j\\ &\mathrm{and} & & \\ & & u_{ij} & =a_{ij}-\sum_{k=1}^{i-1}l_{ik}u_{kj}\qquad\quad i\leq j \end{alignat*} 
We know that fl$$(\sum_{k=1}^{p}x_ky_k)$$=$$\sum_{k=1}^{p}x_ky_k(1+\delta_k)\qquad$$ where $$|\delta_k|\leq p\epsilon_m$$

Using that we get $$$$\hat{u}_{ij}=\big(a_{ij}-\sum_{k=1}^{i-1}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}(1+\delta_k)\big)(1+\delta^\prime)$$$$ with $$|\delta_k|\leq (i-1)\epsilon_m$$ and $$|\delta^\prime|\leq \epsilon_m$$
Then we get \begin{alignat*}{4} & a_{ij}\>\> & = & \>\>\frac{1}{1+\delta^\prime}\hat{u}_{ij} \hat{l}_{ii} & + &\sum_{k=1}^{i-1}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}(1+\delta_k)\qquad\text{Since } \hat{l}_{ii}=1\qquad\\ & & = & \>\>\sum_{k=1}^{i}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj} & + &\sum_{k=1}^{i}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}\delta_k \qquad \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad \end{alignat*} $$\mathrm{where\>\>} |\delta_k|\leq (i-1)\epsilon_m \mathrm{\>and\>} 1+\delta_i=\tfrac{1}{1+\delta^\prime}$$
Hence we get $$E_{ij}=-\sum_{k=1}^{i}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}\delta_k\qquad\qquad$$ when $$i\leq j$$
And for $$i\leq j$$ \begin{alignat*}{3} & |E_{ij}|\> & = |\sum_{k=1}^{i}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}\delta_k| & \leq\sum_{k=1}^{i}|\hat{l}_{ik}||\hat{u}_{kj}||\delta_k|\\ & & & \leq\sum_{k=1}^{i}|\hat{l}_{ik}||\hat{u}_{kj}|n\epsilon_m\\ & & & =n\epsilon_m(|\hat{L}|\cdot |\hat{U}|)_{ij} \end{alignat*}
Similarly for $$l_{ij}$$ we get $$$$\hat{l}_{ij}=\dfrac{(1+\delta^\prime)(a_{ij}-\sum_{k=1}^{j-1}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}(1+\delta_k))}{\hat{u}_{jj}}(1+\delta^{\prime\prime})$$$$ with $$|\delta_k|\leq (j-1)\epsilon_m, |\delta^\prime|\leq\epsilon_m$$ and $$|\delta^{\prime\prime}|\leq\epsilon_m$$
Solving for $$a_{ij}$$ we get \begin{alignat*}{3} & a_{ij} & = & \dfrac{1}{(1+\delta^\prime)(1+\delta^{\prime\prime})}\hat{l}_{ij}\hat{u}_{jj}+\sum_{k=1}^{j-1}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}(1+\delta_k)\\ & \qquad & = & \sum_{k=1}^{j}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}+\sum_{k=1}^{j}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}\delta_k\qquad\mathrm{where\>\>} 1+\delta_j=\dfrac{1}{(1+\delta^\prime)(1+\delta^{\prime\prime})} \end{alignat*}
Therefore we get $$E_{ij}=-\sum_{k=1}^{j}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}\delta_k\qquad$$ when $$i>j$$ with $$|\delta_k|\leq n\epsilon_m$$
Hence for $$i> j$$ \begin{alignat*}{3} & |E_{ij}|\> & |\sum_{k=1}^{j}\hat{l}_{ik}\hat{u}_{kj}\delta_k| & \leq\sum_{k=1}^{j}|\hat{l}_{ik}||\hat{u}_{kj}||\delta_k|\\ & & & \leq\sum_{k=1}^{j}|\hat{l}_{ik}||\hat{u}_{kj}|n\epsilon_m\\ & & & =n\epsilon_m(|\hat{L}|\cdot |\hat{U}|)_{ij} \end{alignat*} 
$$\therefore$$ we get $$$$|E_{ij}|\leq n\epsilon_m(|\hat{L}|\cdot |\hat{U}|)_{ij}\qquad\qquad\hspace{17em}$$$$

Have I done it correctly?