0
$\begingroup$

I started studying measure theory by myself using a book by D. Werner. One thing (apparently easy to prove) that I can't work out is the following (${\mathcal P}(S)$ denotes the power set of S):

${\bf Definition}$: Let $S$ be a set, $E \subset S$ and ${\mathcal E} \subset {\mathcal P}(S)$. Define
\begin{equation} {\mathcal E}\cap E:=\{A \in {\mathcal P}(E): \exists F \in {\mathcal E} \text{ with } A = F\cap E \} \end{equation} to be the trace of ${\mathcal E}$ on $E$.

I could show that ${\mathcal E} \cap E$ is again a $\sigma$ algebra on $E$, if ${\mathcal E}$ is a $\sigma$-algebra on S, but for the following I am lost. The claim is: \begin{equation} \sigma({\mathcal E \cap E}) = \sigma({\mathcal E}) \cap E \end{equation} Maybe this is really trivial, but right now I have no clue how to start.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

From $\mathcal E\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal E)$ it follows immediately that: $$\mathcal E\cap E\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal E)\cap E\tag1$$

You proved that the RHS is a $\sigma$-algebra on $E$ so $(1)$ allows the conclusion:$$\sigma(\mathcal E\cap E)\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal E)\cap E\tag2$$

Now have a look at the collection: $$\mathcal A:=\{F\in\wp(S)\mid F\cap E\in\sigma(\mathcal E\cap E)\}$$

It can be proved that $\mathcal A$ is a $\sigma$-algebra on $S$ (give this a try yourself, and let me know if you get stuck), and this obviously with $\mathcal E\subseteq\mathcal A$, so that also:$$\sigma(\mathcal E)\subseteq\mathcal A$$or equivalently:$$\sigma(\mathcal E)\cap E\subseteq\sigma(\mathcal E\cap E)\tag3$$


Actually the statement $\sigma(\mathcal E\cap E)=\sigma(\mathcal E)\cap E$ can be written as:$$\sigma(i^{-1}(\mathcal E))=i^{-1}(\sigma(\mathcal E))$$where $i:E\to S$ denotes the inclusion.

This can be recognized as a special case of:$$\sigma(f^{-1}(\mathcal E))=f^{-1}(\sigma(\mathcal E))\tag4$$ where $f:T\to S$ is a function.

For a proof of the more general $(4)$ have a look at this answer.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a bunch. This already helps a lot. I feel silly asking this, but for showing that $\mathcal A$ is a sigma algebra on $S$, I need to show $S\in\mathcal A$ which means $S\cap E=E \in \sigma(\mathcal E \cap E)$. But, if I understand correctly $\mathcal E$ can be any subset of $\mathcal{P}(S)$, so how can I be sure that $E\in \sigma(\mathcal E \cap E)$? $\endgroup$ – jkds Sep 27 '18 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ Every $\sigma$-algebra on set $E$ will contain set $E$ and $sigma(\mathcal E\cap E)$ is a $\sigma$-algebra on set $E$. $\endgroup$ – drhab Sep 28 '18 at 7:13
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's what I want to show. But my problem is that the trace of ${\mathcal E}$ on $E$, i.e. ${\mathcal E}\cap E$ might easily cut out some part of $E$. Just for fun, if I take some ${\mathcal E}\subseteq\mathcal{P}(S)$ with $A \cap E = \emptyset$ for every $A \in \mathcal{E}$, then surely $E$ cannot be in $\mathcal{E}\cap E$. Generating a $\sigma$ algebra from $\emptyset$ makes little sense to me. That's what I find puzzling. Do we implicitly assume that the $\sigma$-algebra should be on all of $E$, so that $E$ is included per definition? $\endgroup$ – jkds Sep 28 '18 at 9:38
  • $\begingroup$ Let me repeat with a small addition: Every $\sigma$-algebra on set $E$ will contain set $E$ and $\sigma(\mathcal E\cap E)$ is by definition the smallest $\sigma$-algebra on $E$ that contains the collection $\mathcal E\cap E$ as a sub-collection. So $\sigma(\mathcal E\cap E)$ will contain set $E$. Period! That does not depend on the question $E\in\mathcal E$ or not. In your comment you are saying that “you want to show”, but there is nothing to show! $\endgroup$ – drhab Sep 28 '18 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ In the extremal case where $A\cap E=\varnothing$ for every $E\in\mathcal E$ we have $E\cap\mathcal E=\{\varnothing\}$ (or even stronger where $\mathcal E=\varnothing$ so that $E\cap\mathcal E=\varnothing$). In both cases we have $\sigma(E\cap\mathcal E)=\{\varnothing,E\}$. It certainly makes sense to look at $\sigma$-algebra's generated by $\{\varnothing\}$ or even by $\varnothing$. $\endgroup$ – drhab Sep 28 '18 at 13:56
0
$\begingroup$

Let $A\in \mathcal{E}\cap E$, then $A= F\cap E$ for some $F\in \mathcal E$. Since $\mathcal{E}\subset \sigma(\mathcal E)$, it follows that $A \in \sigma(\mathcal{E})\cap E$. This proves $$ \mathcal{E}\cap E \subset \sigma(\mathcal{E})\cap E. $$ Hence for the generated $\sigma$-Algebras you have$$ \sigma(\mathcal{E}\cap E) \subset \sigma(\sigma(\mathcal{E})\cap E). $$ But the trace of $\sigma$-Algebras is a $\sigma-$Algebra, i.e. $\sigma(\sigma(\mathcal{E})\cap E) = \sigma(\mathcal{E})\cap E$ and you obtain $$ \sigma(\mathcal{E}\cap E) \subset \sigma(\mathcal{E})\cap E. $$ Can you do the other inclusion yourself?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ thanks heaps. I'm still working on the reverse inclusion. $\endgroup$ – jkds Sep 27 '18 at 19:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.