Is there a geometric explanation for why a sphere has surface area $4 \pi r^2$ ?
Ie equal to 4 times its cross-section (a circle of radius r).
-
4$\begingroup$ This link does not give a full answer, but it may help a little: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Sphere_and_Cylinder $\endgroup$– EivindMar 27, 2011 at 13:16
-
$\begingroup$ I would add to the comment of Eivind: the map from the cylinder to the sphere given by orthogonal projection from the axis is area-preserving. It's a nice exercise to show that it shrinks horizontal infinitesimal distances by the same factor as it expands vertical infinitesimal distances. $\endgroup$– user8268Mar 27, 2011 at 13:36
-
$\begingroup$ What does cross-section mean here? $\endgroup$– RasmusMar 27, 2011 at 13:38
-
1$\begingroup$ Here's a cute interpretation of the problem: On a spherical wedge of angle 90°, the curved outer surface has the same surface area as the two planar semicircular ends put together. One can think of these as two non-minimal surfaces on the same boundary curve. Why do they have the same area? (Of course, the answer may just be that it is a coincidence.) $\endgroup$– user856Mar 27, 2011 at 16:38
-
$\begingroup$ See here mathcentral.uregina.ca/QQ/database/QQ.09.99/wilkie1.html $\endgroup$– leonbloyMar 27, 2011 at 17:39
3 Answers
Let $Z$ be a cylinder of height $2r$ touching the sphere $S_r$ along the equator $\theta=0$. Consider now a thin plate orthogonal to the $z$-axis having a thickness $\Delta z\ll r$. It intersects $S_r$ at a certain geographical latitude $\theta$ in a nonplanar annulus of radius $\rho= r\cos\theta$ and width $\Delta s=\Delta z/\cos\theta$, and it intersects $Z$ in a cylinder of height $\Delta z$. Both these "annuli" have the same area $2\pi r \Delta z$. As this is true for any such plate it follows that the total area of the sphere $S_r$ is the same as the total area of $Z$, namely $4\pi r^2$.
-
$\begingroup$ A "plate" here just means a very short cylinder, right? $\endgroup$– LarsHMar 14, 2015 at 20:34
-
One geometric explanation is that $4\pi r^2$ is the derivative of $\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3$, the volume of the ball with radius $r$, with respect to $r$. This is because if you enlarge $r$ a little bit, the volume of the ball will change by its surface times the small enlargement of $r$.
So why is the volume of the full ball $\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3$? By slicing the ball into disks, using Pythagoras, you get that its volume is $$ \int_{-r}^r \pi (r^2-x^2)\mathrm{d}x $$ which is indeed $\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3$.
-
1$\begingroup$ Is this true for all manifolds, dV/dr=S?, where V is the n-volume and S is the n-1-surface and r is the distance from a point in the interior to the surcface ? $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2011 at 13:58
-
$\begingroup$ @solomoan: I think you will have trouble defining "the distance from a point in the interior to the surface" for a general manifold with boundary. I don't see how to generalise the result in a meaningful way to general manifolds. $\endgroup$– RasmusMar 27, 2011 at 14:02
-
$\begingroup$ @solomoan: If $$f: B\to{\mathbb R}^3, \quad (u,v)\mapsto f(u,v)$$ produces a surface $S$ with unit normal $n(u,v)$ then $$x: \ B\times[0,\epsilon]\ \to\ {\mathbb R}^3, \quad (u,v,t)\mapsto f(u,v)+ t n(u,v)$$ produces a plate of thickness $\epsilon$. You can compute the volume $V(\epsilon)$ of this plate by means of the Jacobian of $x$, and calculating the limit $$\lim_{\epsilon\to0}{V(\epsilon)\over\epsilon}$$ you get the formula for the surface area $\omega(S)$. $\endgroup$ Mar 27, 2011 at 14:18
In the first step consider a hemi-sphere radius $R$ and its enveloping cylinder at the equator of sphere of length $R$.
$ \cos \phi = r/R = dz/dl $
$ d Area = 2 \pi r dl $
This results in same area
$$ 2 \pi R^2 $$
so a finite slice width has the same area either for a cone or cylinder of same width $\Delta z $.
Now consider the second step. it is comfortable to calculate flat areas, use the well known method of area calculation:
Cut the free boundary into an infinity of divisions of triangles, cut and discard every alternate infinitesimal narrow triangle,this will again cut into half its area, now to:
$$ 2 \pi R^2. $$
EDIT1
The area of a sphere segment is seen from integration as $ 2 \pi R $ times axial length of the spherical segment, which is the diameter for the full sphere.