0
$\begingroup$

I am having a hard time understanding the definition of a limit.

Specifically, why we define convergence to L (when there exists N such that for all $n>N$) as

$|s_n-L| <\epsilon$

instead of

$s_n-L<\epsilon$

I have been thinking about this for a while and I can't seem to wrap my head around why we need the absolute value.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ What if $s_n - L$ is $-1000$? Then $ s_n - L < \epsilon$ yet $s_n$ is nowhere near $L$. $\endgroup$ – littleO Sep 21 '18 at 0:51
3
$\begingroup$

Absolute value measures distance.

We want a statement that says, when $n$ is large enough, then the distance between $s_n$ and $L$ get smaller and smaller.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Think of the case $s_n = \displaystyle{\sum_{k = 1}^{n}} -\frac{1}{2^k}$. It clearly approaches $-1$ and the distance $|s_n - (-1)|$ gets arbitrarily close to $0$, but if we used $s_n - (-1)$, it doesn't make sense to say "distance" since it will be negative. The absolute value is just a convenience, so we don't have to worry about negatives and can say that the distance gets arbitrarily close to $0$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.