Suppose that we are talking about the linear map $$e^i\wedge:\text{Alt}(\otimes^pV^*)\to\text{Alt}(\otimes^{p+1}V^*),$$ which maps exterior $p$-forms to $(p+1)$-forms.

In my mind, this is the equivallent to the "exterior derivative" $d$ that arises in the context of differential geometry between differential forms living on the cotangent spaces of manifolds. That map is defined by $$d\omega(X_0,...,X_k)=\sum_i(-1)^iX_i(\omega(X_0,...,\hat X_i,...,X_k))+\sum_{i<j}(-1)^{i+j}\omega([X_i,X_j],X_0,...,\hat X_i,...,\hat X_j,...,X_k),$$ where the $\hat X_i$ denotes the omiting of $X_i$ in the arguments etc.

My questions are the following:

  1. Is there a similar definition of the $e^i\wedge$ "exterior derivative", with respect to its vector arguments?
  2. Is the $e^i\wedge$ map unique? I mean, I suppose that there are lots of maps of this kind, since $i$ is unfixed.

You've just given a well-known construct in exterior algebra. (The analogy with the exterior derivative is really not right, because this construction will generalize to something linear over the $C^\infty$ functions, namely wedging with a fixed $1$-form on the manifold, whereas $d(f\omega) \ne f d\omega$ for general functions $f$.) The appearance of Lie brackets in the exterior derivative formula is, on the other hand, what's needed to make the resulting object a tensor field, namely (multi-)linear over $C^\infty$ functions in the sense that $d\omega(X_0,\dots,fX_i,\dots,X_k) = f d\omega(X_0,\dots,X_i,\dots,X_k)$. There is no such thing when we work in a fixed vector space, as scalars always pull out.

Given any vector $\alpha\in V^*$ and any vector $v\in V$, you can define two different linear maps: \begin{align*} e_\alpha\colon& \Lambda^k V^* \to \Lambda^{k+1} V^*, \quad\text{given by } e_\alpha(\tau) = \alpha\wedge\tau \\ \iota_v\colon& \Lambda^k V^* \to \Lambda^{k-1}V^*, \quad\text{given by } \iota_v(\tau)(v_1,\dots,v_{k-1}) = \tau(v,v_1,\dots,v_{k-1}). \end{align*} These are often called, respectively, exterior and interior product. Of course, you can write out the definition of the exterior product in terms of the value on $k+1$ vectors, with appropriate constants and signs on permutations. This is part of the standard definition in exterior algebra (if you think of it as a subspace of $\otimes^\bullet V^*$, rather than as a quotient space).

A further tangential comment: If you choose a basis $\{e_1,\dots,e_n\}$ for $V$ and the corresponding dual basis $\{\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n\}$ for $V^*$, then $$\iota_{v_i}\big(e_{\alpha_i} \tau\big) = \tau \qquad\text{and}\qquad e_{\alpha_i}\big(\iota_{v_i}\tau\big) = \tau.$$ (Depending on numeric conventions, perhaps some constant may appear.)

  • $\begingroup$ I know that we are discouraged from commenting things like "Thanks" etc, but thank you very much for this clear explanation! $\endgroup$ – Ozz Sep 20 '18 at 23:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You're welcome, @GK. I hope you enjoy contributing to the site in various ways. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Sep 20 '18 at 23:12
  • $\begingroup$ One more question: I am thinking about the quantity $\iota_{v_i}e_{\alpha_i}+e_{\alpha_i}\iota_{v_i}$. This will give $2\tau$ when it acts on a form $\tau$ and it just reminds me of the Cartan formula for the Lie derivative. Is there any comment on this? I mean does the aforementioned quantity represent anything equivallent to the Lie derivative? $\endgroup$ – Ozz Sep 21 '18 at 21:08
  • $\begingroup$ Well, not so far as I can tell, since it's just a scalar multiple of the identity. The Cartan formula for the Lie derivative is really a chain homotopy formula, saying the Lie derivative is chain homotopic to the zero map. It's once again very hard to analogize things in a static vector space with things on a manifold with the structure of $d$ and vector fields. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Sep 21 '18 at 22:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.