0
$\begingroup$

Let $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P)$ be a probability space, $X:\Omega\to\mathbb{R^+}$ be a non-negative $\mathcal{F}-$measurable random variable with $E[X]=\infty$ and $\mathcal{H}\subset\mathcal{F}$ be a sub-$\sigma-$algebra. How can we show the existence of $E[X|\mathcal{H}]$?

For a real valued random variable with finite expectation I can understand the proof from wikipedia. It defines a measure $\mu^X:F\in\mathcal{F}\mapsto\int_F XdP$ and restricts it on $\mathcal{H}$. Then use the Radon–Nikodym derivative to show the existence. In case $E[X]=\infty$ the measure $\mu^X$ is not finite anymore. However, if we impose it to be $\sigma-$finite we can still use the Radon–Nikodym derivative.

I do not think it is true in general that such $\mu^X$ is $\sigma-$finite. Is there a way to show existence for such a random variable without this assumption?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps you could look at $X_n=\min(n,X)$? $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Sep 11 '18 at 23:26
  • $\begingroup$ When you say the existence of E[X|H], does E[X|H]=∞ count as existing? I would have thought no. And if the expectation is infinite then surely the conditional expectation could also be infinite, for some choices of H, in which case the thing you're trying to show isn't true. $\endgroup$ – Steven Irrgang Sep 11 '18 at 23:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If it helps, you can show in general that $\mu^X$ is $\sigma$-finite. $\endgroup$ – Mike Earnest Sep 11 '18 at 23:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @StevenIrrgang I think working on extended Real line, conditional expectation being $\infty$ still counts as existence, similar to Lebesgue integral for $[0,+\infty]$ valued functions. Also, it could be a case where expectation is infinite while its conditional is not, [1] is an example. Grimmett text, referenced there, derives conditional expectation without finite assumption for continuous r.v.s but not using measure theory. [1]: math.stackexchange.com/questions/725323/… $\endgroup$ – RozaTh Sep 12 '18 at 4:18
  • $\begingroup$ @MikeEarnest Would you please explain how we can show it is $\sigma-$finite for a generic probability space and $X$? I guess we can use $X_n$ as suggested in the first comment to find the finite measure sequence, right? $\endgroup$ – RozaTh Sep 12 '18 at 4:22
1
$\begingroup$

To prove $\mu^X$ is $\sigma$-finite, note $\Omega=\bigcup_{n\in \mathbb N}\{|X|\le n\}$, and $\mu^X(|X|\le n)\le n$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.