In my book, I encountered the following problem:
Prove that any division ring of characteristic $0$ contains a division subring which is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Q}.$
I looked this up online and found a similar property, except that instead of division (sub)ring it was about a (sub)field. I tried to recreate the proof I found here, but I didn't succeed because I lacked the commutative property a field has, and a division ring doesn't.
Now I'm wondering if this problem is true at all, or the authors simply meant "field" instead of "division ring".