2
$\begingroup$

I have to solve an exercise the result of which will lead to the completeness of the Hausdorff distance. Basically it si the fulfilling of the details of this answer https://math.stackexchange.com/q/2197008

My definitions:

In all the following $ (X,d) $ will be a metric space and $B(x,r) = \{ y \in X : d(x,y)<r \}$ for any $x \in X$ and $r>0$.

.Let $C \subset X$ and $r>0$, then $C_r := \bigcup_{y \in C}B(y,r)$.

.Let $\mathcal{X}$ be the collection of the nonempty, closed and bounded subsets of $X$. Then for every $C,D \in \mathcal{X} $ the Hausdorff distance is defined as $$h(C,D) := \inf \{ r | C \subset D_r , D \subset C_r \} $$

The proposition I want to prove is:

If $(X,d)$ is complete, then $(\mathcal{X},h)$ is complete.

The book suggest to consider a sequence $ \{A_n \} \subset \mathcal{X}$ s.t. $h(A_n, A_{n+1})<2^{-n}$ and to prove that it converges to the closure of the limit points of the sequences $\{ x_n \} $ s.t. $x_n \in A_n$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$.

My attempt

Let $ \{A_n \} \subset \mathcal{X}$ be a Cauchy sequence. I can extract a subsequence (which I will call again $ \{A_n \}$) s.t. $h(A_n, A_{n+1})<2^{-n}$. If I prove the convergence of this subsequence I have the thesis. Following the suggestion let $ A \subset X $ be defined as $$A:= \{ x \in X | \exists \{x_n\} s.t. x_n \in A_n \forall n \in \mathbb{N} \, , \, x_n \to x \} $$ and I want to prove $\overline{A} \in \mathcal{X}$ and $ \{A_n \}$ converges to $\overline{A}$.

  1. $A \ne \emptyset$ : every sequence $ \{x_n\}$ s.t. $x_n \in A_n$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$ is Cauchy and then it has a limit. Note every $A_n$ is nonempty then those sequences actually exist.
  2. $A$ is bdd: first of all observe that (by Cauchy property) $ \exists N \in \mathbb{N} $ s.t. $h(A_N, A_n) < 1$ for all $n \ge N$. Since $A_N$ is bdd then $\exists R>0$ and $y \in X$ s.t. $A_N \subset B(y, R)$. Then $A_n \subset B(y, R+1)$ for all $n \ge N$. Suppose $A$ is not bdd, then $\exists x \in A$ s.t. $d(y,x) > 3(R+1)$. By definition of $A$, $x$ is the limit point of some sequence $\{x_n\}$ with $x_n \in A_n$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$. Then $ \exists M \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t. $d(x,x_n)<R+1$ for all $n \ge M$. Take any $n \ge \max\{N,M\}$, then $d(y,x_n) \ge 2(R+1)$ but then $A_n$ is not included in $B(y,R+1)$. Contradiction.
  3. By 1. and 2. we have $\overline{A}$ is nonempty, bdd and closed hence an element of $\mathcal{X}$.

Now I want to prove $ \{A_n \}$ converges to $\overline{A}$. Let $\epsilon>0$ be fixed, I have to prove $\exists N_{\epsilon} \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t. $h(A_n, \overline{A})< \epsilon$ for all $n \ge N_{\epsilon}$ and it is enough to prove that $\exists N_{\epsilon} \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t.

a. $ \forall \, x \in A_n \, \, \exists z \in \overline{A}$ s.t. $d(x, z)< \epsilon$

b. $ \forall \, y \in \overline{A} \, \, \exists w \in A_n $ s.t. $d(y, w)< \epsilon$

for all $n \ge N_{\epsilon}$.

a. Take $N_1$ s.t. $2^{-N_1}< \epsilon/2$, then $h(A_n, A_{n+1}) < 2^{-n}$ for all $n \ge N_1$. Take $m \ge N_1$ and $x \in A_m$. Then there exists a sequence $\{ x_n \} $ s.t. $x_n \in A_n$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$ s.t. $x_m=x$ with limit point $z \in A$ and s.t. $d(x_n, x_{n+1})<2^{-n}$. If $n>m \ge N_1$ then $d(x_m,x_n) < \sum_{j=m}^{n-1}d(x_j,x_{j+1}) =2^{-m}\sum_{j=0}^{n-m-1}2^{-j} <2^{-m+1} < \epsilon$ and then $d(x_m,z) < \epsilon$.

b. Take $N_2$ s.t. $h(A_n, A_{n+1}) <2^{-N_2}<\epsilon/4$ for all $n \ge N_2$. Let $y \in \overline{A}$, then take $u \in B(y, \epsilon/2) \cap A \ne \emptyset$. Then take any sequence $\{x_n\}$ s.t. $x_n \in A_n$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $x_n \to u$ and s.t. $d(x_n,x_{n+1})<2^{-n}$ for all $n \ge N_2$. If $m>n \ge N_2$ then $d(x_m,x_n) < \sum_{j=n}^{m-1}d(x_j,x_{j+1}) =2^{-n}\sum_{j=0}^{m-n-1}2^{-j} <2^{-n+1} < \epsilon/2$ and then $d(x_m,u) < \epsilon/2$. Then if $w=x_m$, $d(y,w) \le d(y,u)+d(u,w) <\epsilon$.

Then it is enough to take $N_{\epsilon} = \max \{N_1, N_2 \}$.

My doubts

Have I used in some crucial way the subsequence with distance $2^{-n}$? Maybe If not I'm not sure that every $ \{x_n \}$ s.t. $ x_n \in A_n $ is Cauchy?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Your proof that $A\neq\emptyset$ is wrong: not every (arbitrary) sequence like that is automatically a Cauchy sequence. But start with $x_0\in A_0$ and then find $x_1\in A_1$ with $d(x_0,x_1)<2^0$, then $x_2\in A_2$ with $d(x_1,x_2)<2^{-1}$, $x_3\in A_3$ with $d(x_2,x_3)<2^{-2}$, ..., $x_{n+1}\in A_{n+1}$ with $d(x_n,x_{n+1})<2^{-n}$, ... that will be a Cauchy sequence.

Your proof of a does not hold water: as above, there is no guarantee that an arbitrary sequence will satisfy the condition that you specify.

Neither does your proof in b: $N_2$ depends ultimately on $y$ (via $u$ and the sequence converging to $u$); it should be independent of the point in the closure of $A$.

Your doubts: you have used the $2^{-n}$ when going from $R$ to $R+1$, because $\sum_{n\ne N}2^{-n}\le1$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your answer. For the part of $A \ne \emptyset$ you are right, I realized it by myself yet. In the proof af a. I wrote "there exists a sequence" , not "every sequence". In the proof of b, you are right: I have edited the question. Is it ok now? $\endgroup$ – Bremen000 Sep 11 '18 at 12:52
  • $\begingroup$ OK I've edited both a. and b. Does it work now? $\endgroup$ – Bremen000 Sep 11 '18 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ Point 1 is still the old one; you have to mention a construction there as well. $\endgroup$ – hartkp Sep 12 '18 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you are right. I didn't change point 1. because, as you have said in your answer, I can extract a Cauchy sequence from the $ \{A_n \}$ s.t. $x_n \in A_n$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$. It is something I already knew because it was the statement of another point of this exercise on the book, and I used exactly your argument to prove it. So my concerns were only about points a. and b. . I think that, with your correction of point 1. , everything should work! Does it? $\endgroup$ – Bremen000 Sep 12 '18 at 18:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.