13
$\begingroup$

Thanks for reading my question. I'm wonder why a symplectic form should be closed. I found many different answers in the internet, but it sounds like a technical requirement (if we omit this requisit, we obtain almost symplectic structures, insteresting as well). Why do yo think? I just want to have a fresh perspective. Thank you in advance.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This has been discussed on MathsOverflow. It seems that things such as conservation of energy and momentum would not be true if the two form were not closed. mathoverflow.net/questions/19932/… $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 29, 2013 at 22:01

1 Answer 1

19
$\begingroup$

There are many reasons why we might want a symplectic form to be closed by definition. Here are a few:

  • A closed $2$-form represents a cohomology class in $H^2(M; \Bbb R)$.

  • When $\omega$ is closed, we get a one-to-one correspondence between $1$-parameter groups of symplectomorphisms and symplectic vector fields. We also get Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms from this, which turn out to be interesting for symplectic geometers.

  • The local rigidity theorems for symplectic manifolds, such as Darboux's theorem, Moser's stability theorem, Weinstein's tubular neighborhood theorem, and so on rely on the closedness of the symplectic form. I think some such results hold more generally, for example Gotay's coisotropic neighborhood theorem holds for presymplectic manifolds if I recall correctly. In any case, these results are what give symplectic geometry its global nature.

There's other reasons based on physical considerations as well. In short, closedness of a symplectic form is a rather mild condition that gives rise to a lot of nice structure we wouldn't otherwise have.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! It's a very clear explanation :D $\endgroup$
    – juliho
    Commented Jan 31, 2013 at 16:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .