# Elliptic curves over Spec Z

I want to show that there are only finitely many elliptic curves over Spec $\mathbf Z$ without appealing to Siegel's theorem or Shafarevich' theorem.

Firstly, I think (but I am not sure) that such an elliptic curve has a Weierstrass equation $y^2=x^3+Ax+B$ with $A$ and $B$ in $\mathbf Z$. Is this true? (I think there are some problems at the primes $2$ and $3$.)

Then, by the fact that this is an elliptic curve over $\mathbf Z$, we have that the discriminant $-16(4A^3+27B^2)$ is an element of $\mathbf Z^\times = \{\pm 1\}$. Is this true?

But the absolute value of the discriminant is at least $16$, so it is never $1$. QED

Is this a correct proof?

• How do you get the Weierstrass equation? – Martin Brandenburg Jan 29 '13 at 23:07
• I wanted to be sure myself, but let $E$ be an elliptic curve over $\mathbf Q$ with good reduction over $\mathbf Z$. Then its minimal regular model coincides with its minimal Weierstrass model. – Harry Jan 29 '13 at 23:53

## 2 Answers

For 2 elementary proofs of this fact see: http://www.cems.uvm.edu/~voight/notes/274-Schoof.pdf

• Unfortunately, John Voight has left UVM. Here is an updated link: math.dartmouth.edu/~jvoight/notes/274-Schoof.pdf. You may want to quote part of the proof in case he moves again! – André 3000 Jan 17 '14 at 1:51
• The theorem is from Tate (page 2 of your reference) : "There is no elliptic curve over $\Bbb Q$ with good reduction modulo every prime $p$." – Watson Nov 25 '18 at 9:48

Yes your equation is not the good one at $p=2, 3$. An elliptic curve over $\mathbb Z$ has an equation $$y^2+(a_1x+a_3)y=x^3+a_2x^2+a_4x+a_6, \quad a_i\in \mathbb Z$$ with discriminant equal to $\pm 1$. The discriminant of this equation is $$\Delta=2^{-8}\mathrm{disc}(4(x^3+a_2x^2+a_4x+a_6)+(a_1x+a_3)^2).$$ You can find an explicit formula of the discriminant $\Delta$ in terms of the $a_i$ in Silverman's book. I am told that Tate proved there is no elliptic curve of $\mathbb Z$ by direct computations.