4
$\begingroup$

In a paper of McMullen he considers foliations on a manifold determined by a closed 1-form $\rho$. He says an $L^\infty$ function $f$ is constant on the leaves of the foliation if "$df \wedge \rho = 0$ as a current," and I'm having a hard time unwinding exactly what's happening with the currents (which I'm not very familiar with).

My understanding is that currents are functionals on differential forms, and given a function $f$ we can define a current on $n$-forms (for an $n$-dimensional manifold) by integrating $f$ times the $n$-form. Similarly, the 1-form $\rho$ defines a current on the $(n-1)$-forms by integrating the wedge of the form with $\rho$. But what's going on with $df \wedge \rho$? I get that we can define a differential of a current by $[dT](\omega) = T(d\omega)$, so I guess $df$ refers to the current on $n-1$ forms which sends $\omega \mapsto \int f d\omega$, but how is the wedge with $\rho$ defined?

My only guess is that $df \wedge \rho$ is a current acting on $(n-2)$ forms sending $\omega \mapsto \int f \cdot (d\omega \wedge \rho)$. Even if that's correct, why does $f$ being constant on leaves imply this current is zero? It seems strange to me that functions constant on the leaves of the foliation determined by $\rho$, which have codimension $1$, can be expressed in terms of $n-2$ forms.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I’m pretty sure your guess about currents is correct. If you’re comfortable with sheaves, I can provide a reference. $\endgroup$ – Avi Steiner Aug 18 '18 at 16:20
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, Avi. Any reference would be appreciated, thanks. $\endgroup$ – cjohnson Aug 18 '18 at 17:08
  • $\begingroup$ Try de Rham's book "Differentiable manifolds : forms, currents, harmonic forms" $\endgroup$ – Avi Steiner Aug 19 '18 at 19:03
2
$\begingroup$

First of all, when $f$ is smooth, we know that $df$ is a (functional) multiple of $\rho$ (e.g., because the gradient is orthogonal to level hypersurfaces).

If $T$ is a current acting on $k$-forms and $\phi$ is an $\ell$-form (with $\ell\le k$), then $T\wedge\phi$ is defined to be the current acting on $(k-\ell)$-forms given by $(T\wedge\phi)(\omega) = T(\phi\wedge\omega)$ for any $(k-\ell)$-form $\omega$. So you're right that $df\wedge\rho$ is given as a current by $$(df\wedge\rho)(\omega) = df(\rho\wedge\omega) = f\big(d(\rho\wedge\omega)\big) = -f(\rho\wedge d\omega),$$ since $d\rho = 0$.

As a philosophical remark, one often thinks of $(n-k)$-currents (which act on $k$-forms) as $(n-k)$-forms with locally integrable (as opposed to smooth) coefficients.

If $f$ is smooth, then note that $\int_M f\rho\wedge d\omega = \int_M d(f\rho\wedge\omega) = 0$ (either because $\partial M = \emptyset$ or because $\omega$ has compact support, either way by Stokes's Theorem).

To see what's going on in general, by Frobenius, we can choose local coordinates $(x^1,\dots,x^n)$ so that $\rho = dx^n$. It follows from the hypothesis, moreover, that $f=f(x^n)$. By a usual partition of unity argument, we can suppose $\omega$ has compact support in our coordinate chart $U$. Working mod $dx^n$, we may take $\omega = \sum\limits_{i=1}^{n-1} g_i dx^1\wedge\dots\wedge\widehat{dx^i}\wedge\dots\wedge dx^{n-1}$, so that $d\omega = \sum \dfrac{\partial g_i}{\partial x^i} dx^1\wedge\dots\wedge dx^{n-1}$ (again mod $dx^n$). As with the usual proof of Stokes's Theorem, note now that $$\int_U f\rho d\omega = \pm\int_U f(x^n)\sum \frac{\partial g_i}{\partial x^i} dx^1\wedge\dots\wedge dx^n.$$ Now apply Fubini: For the $i$th term, integrate first with respect to $dx^i$, noting that the fact that $f=f(x^n)$ allows us to pull that out of the integral; by compact support in $U$, we get $0$ for every term.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.