0
$\begingroup$

A cone is divided into two parts: upper part is a small cone and the lower part is a frustum. Given: Radius of frustum( R) =10, radius of upper cone( r)= 5, slant height of frustum (S)= 12, Slant height of whole cone= 20, slant height of upper cone (s)= 8 I tried to find the lateral surface area of a frustum of a cone. First I used: phi X (R+r) X s. Then I used another method: lateral surface area if big cone minus that of small cone. But the results are different. The first is 3.14 x (10+5) x 12= 565.2. The second is (3.14 x 10 x 20) - (3.14 x 5 x 8)=502.4 Please help!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to MSE! Please try to be a bit clearer as to what each constant refers to. Note also that you can format your text using MathJax to improve readability. For some basic help for Mathjax, see here. $\endgroup$ – Sambo Aug 16 '18 at 16:53
1
$\begingroup$

You don't really have a cone here. See that the ratio of radius to slant height of the small cone is $5/8$. For the big cone it is $10/20$ and for the frustum the equivalent ratio is $5/12$. None of these ratios are equal to each other. If you change the slant height of the small cone to $12$, then things would work out.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So the ratio of radii and slant heights must be equal because of triangles similarity? Then the writer of the problem can't have realized this. Thanks $\endgroup$ – David HM Aug 16 '18 at 17:31
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidHM Yes. Similar triangles is the way to think about it. $\endgroup$ – B. Goddard Aug 16 '18 at 18:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.