0
$\begingroup$

Prove that if $A,B$ are closed sets such that $A\cap B\neq \emptyset$, there exists $U,V$ open sets such that $A\subset U$, $B\subset V$, and $U\cap V= \emptyset$.

I am thinking of going by contradiction, that is: $\forall\; U,V$ open sets such that $A\subset U$, $B\subset V$, and $U\cap V\neq \emptyset$.

Let $ U,V$ open. Then, $\exists\;r_1,r_2$ such that $B(x,r_1)\subset U$ and $B(x,r_2)\subset V.$ From here, I don't know how to get a contradiction. Can anyone help me out?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ $A\subset U, B\subset V$ implies that $A\cap B\subset U\cap V$. $\endgroup$ – Tsemo Aristide Aug 9 '18 at 0:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Tsemo Aristide: But $A\cap B\neq \emptyset.$ $\endgroup$ – Omojola Micheal Aug 9 '18 at 0:42
  • $\begingroup$ @mfl: I'm sorry! But how would that help me? $\endgroup$ – Omojola Micheal Aug 9 '18 at 0:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ΘΣΦGenSan: You mean the question is not correct? $\endgroup$ – Omojola Micheal Aug 9 '18 at 0:50
  • $\begingroup$ are you interested in a proof if we assume $A, B$ are compact? $\endgroup$ – Matt A Pelto Aug 9 '18 at 1:36
4
$\begingroup$

This is not true in general.

Consider $\Bbb{R}$ with the usual topology, and set $A = [0,1]$ and $B = [1,2]$.

First, we have $A\cap B = \{1\}\ne\emptyset$. Any two open subsets $U\subset A$ and $V\subset B$ cannot contain $1$ since they would have to contain a small neighborhood around $1$, which neither $A$ nor $B$ do. Thus $1\notin U$ and $1\notin V$. Therefore, $U\cap V \subset A\cap B=\{1\}$, so $U\cap V =\emptyset$.


Edit:

I just realized that your question asks for $U\cap V$ to be empty, and thus my counterexample is merely an example. Moreover, the question stipulates that $A\subset U$ and $B\subset V$, whereas I assumed the opposite inclusion.

If you assume that $A\subset U$ and $B\subset V$, then $A\cap B \ne\emptyset$ always implies that $U\cap V\ne\emptyset$ as Tsemo Atistide pointed out in the comments.

If you do in fact assume the opposite inclusion, where you are asking for open sets inside the closed sets, then $U\cap V = \emptyset$ can never hold for closed sets with empty interior, as they contain no open sets by definition.

Are you sure the question is correct as written?

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.