Is there a way to describe all finite groups $G$ such that $\operatorname{Aut}(G) \cong S_3$?

Two groups that definitely satisfy that condition are $S_3$ itself (as it is a complete group) and $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$ (as $S_3$ is isomorphic to $GL(2, 2)$).

I have read somewhere that those two groups are the only two groups that satisfy that condition. There was no proof of this statement given, however, so I do not know whether it is true or false (and if it is true, it would be interesting to know the proof).

Any help will be appreciated.


Partial answer: look at $G/Z(G)$, the subgroup of inner automorphisms of $Aut(G)$. This group has order $1,2,3$ or $6$. The first three cases all lead to $G$ being abelian (we use the well-known: if $G/Z(G)$ is cyclic, then $G$ is abelian). The only abelian case is $G \cong V_4$ as you mentioned.

Hence we can focus on $G/Z(G) \cong S_3$. Indeed, as you mentioned $G=S_3$ is an example. So we are now talking about central extensions of $S_3$. These are "measured" by the so-called Schur Multiplier (and really is a cohomology group, see here.) We can infer that $G' \cong A_3$. This last fact requires some more sophistication: there is a theorem that says: if $G$ has an abelian Sylow $p$-subgroup, then $p$ does not divide $|G' \cap Z(G)|$. The proof of this requires transfer (which is connected to cohomology theory) or character theory.


$\newcommand{\Span}[1]{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}$$\DeclareMathOperator{\Aut}{Aut}$$\DeclareMathOperator{\Inn}{Inn}$Let me continue the work of Nicky Hekster, so let $G/Z(G) \cong S_{3}$, so that all automorphism are inner.

Let $a, b \in G$ be elements such that $a Z(G)$ has order $3$ and $b Z(G)$ has order $2$ in $G/Z(G)$, so that $[a Z(G), bZ(G)] = aZ(G)$, and thus $[a, b] = a z$ for some $z \in Z(G)$. Thus $[a z, b] = [a, b] = a z$. Redefining $a$ as $a z$, we may thus assume $[a, b] = a$. In particular, $a$ commutes with $[a, b]$, so that for every $n$ we have $[a^n, b] = a^n$. Since $a^3 \in Z(G)$, we have $a^3 = [a^3, b] = 1$, so that $a$ has order $3$.

Note that this shows that $$\tag{comm}G' = [G, G] = [G, \Inn(G)] = [G, \Aut(G)] = \Span{a}$$ has order $3$.

We have $a^b = a [a, b] = a^2 = a^{-1}$. If the order of $G$ is $2^h \cdot s$, with $s$ odd, we see that $a^{b^s} = a^{-1}$, so that replacing $b$ with $b^s$ we may assume that $b$ has order $2^l$, for some $l \ge 1$.

If $l > 1$, one sees that the map on $G$, that is the identity on $a$ and $Z(G)$, and maps $b$ to $b^{1 + 2^{l-1}}$, extends to an automorphism $\gamma$ of $G$ such that $[b, \gamma] = b^{2^{l-1}} \notin \Span{a}$, contradicting (comm). Therefore $b$ has order $2$.

We are nearly there. We have now $G = \Span{a, b} \times Z(G)$, where $\Span{a, b} \cong S_{3}$. We want to show that $Z(G) = 1$. If $Z(G) \ne 1$, we see that there are extra automorphisms coming from $Z(G)$, unless $Z(G) = \Span{w}$ has order $2$. But then the map that fixes $a$ and $w$, and maps $b$ to $b w$, extends to an automorphism $\delta$ of $G$ such that $[b, \delta] = w \notin \Span{a}$, once more contradicting (comm).

  • $\begingroup$ What is the most general theorem you can prove along the lines of this argument? It would be nice to have $S_3$ as a mere corollary of that. $\endgroup$ – the_fox Sep 24 '18 at 0:53
  • $\begingroup$ @the_fox, which kind of generalisation do you have in mind? $\endgroup$ – Andreas Caranti Sep 24 '18 at 14:13
  • $\begingroup$ I don't know. I can think about it in a couple of weeks time, but maybe you see something already. As an example, can you handle $\operatorname{Aut}(G) \cong C_p \rtimes C_q$? $\endgroup$ – the_fox Sep 24 '18 at 17:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.