1
$\begingroup$

Does there exist a bounded holomorphic function in the unit disk $D$ such that $$f\left(1-\frac{1}{n}\right) = \frac{(-1)^n}{n}$$ for $n = 1,2,3,\dots$ ?

Sorry it's not homework so I've no idea how should I begin. I only noticed that $\{1-1/n\}$ has a limit point out of $D$. Also $f'(1)$ does not exist.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The obvious candidate for such $f$ is $ f(z)=(1-z)\cos\frac{\pi}{1-z}$, but that is not bounded $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Aug 6 '18 at 6:08
  • $\begingroup$ I'm still wondering about the proof from fred, because if $f$ is bounded and analytic then why should the value at $1$ on the boundary not exist? If it would not I would even say the function is not holomorph. $\endgroup$ – Diger Aug 6 '18 at 6:41
  • $\begingroup$ Diger, f(z)=1/(1-z) is holomorphic on the open unit disk and is not bounded there. $\endgroup$ – zokomoko Aug 6 '18 at 6:58
  • $\begingroup$ @HagenvonEitzen Is guessing enough? Seems identity theorem doesn't apply here. $\endgroup$ – MonkeyKing Aug 6 '18 at 17:21
4
$\begingroup$

It is a well known consequence of Jensen's inequality that if $g$ is a non-zero bounded analytic function in the unit disk and its zeros are $a_1,a_2,...$ the $\sum [1-|a_n|] <\infty$. Let $g(z)=f(z)-(1-z)$. Then its zeros include $\{1-\frac 1 {2n}\}$ which do not satisfy the summability condition. Hence $f(z)\equiv (1-z)$. But this does not satisfy the hypothesis for odd $n$ so there is no bounded analytic function with the given property.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The section on Blaschke Products in Rudin's RCA has a proof of the result I have used in my answer. $\endgroup$ – Kavi Rama Murthy Aug 6 '18 at 7:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the reference. It's theorem 15.23 (in my edition). Took me a while to dig up what $U$ means in that setting. I had a guess, and Rudin does provide a list of symbols :-). I was a bit surprised that $U$ is reserved for the open unit disk because in topology books it is more often a generic open set. $\endgroup$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Aug 6 '18 at 7:52
  • $\begingroup$ @JyrkiLahtonen I didn't give you the theorem number because I have an Indain edition of the book and theorem numbers don't match with international editions. $\endgroup$ – Kavi Rama Murthy Aug 6 '18 at 7:55
  • $\begingroup$ That's fine. Mentioning Blaschke products is sufficient. After all, that section is not too long. Also, theorem numbers may vary from one edition to another. Mine is the 3rd. $\endgroup$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Aug 6 '18 at 7:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.