I am trying to classify the groups of order 585. (It is known that there are 4 of distinct non-isomorphic groups, but I am not assuming it.)

The question further asks to show that any group of this size has a cyclic subgroup of prime index, and the center is non-trivial with a composite order.

My attempt so far:

Note that $|{G}|=585=3^2\cdot 5\cdot 13$. By Sylow, $n_3\in \{1,13\}$, $n_5=1$, and $n_{13}=1$. Denote by $S_{3}$, $S_5$, $S_{13}$, the Sylow subgroups of respective order. It then follows that $S_5\cong \mathbb{Z}_5$, $S_{13}\cong \mathbb{Z}_{13}$, and $S_3$ is isomorphic to either $\mathbb{Z}_9$ or $\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_3$.

Take $\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13}$. This is a normal subgroup that is cyclic (but not with prime index), hence all groups of order 585 are either of the form

  1. $(\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13})\rtimes \mathbb{Z}_9$
  2. $(\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13})\rtimes (\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_3)$.

The immediate ones are:

(i) $\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13}\times \mathbb{Z}_9$

(ii) $\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13}\times \mathbb{Z}_3\times \mathbb{Z}_3$

These clearly have cyclic subgroups of prime index, namely, $\mathbb{Z}_{13}\times \mathbb{Z}_9$ (or $\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_9$) and $\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13}\times \mathbb{Z}_3$. Also, these are abelian groups, so they obviously have non-trivial center of composite order (namely, 585).

Okay, let's find then the non-trivial semi-direct products. To investigate the Case 1, we need to identify the homomorphisms $\varphi:\mathbb{Z}_9\to\mathrm{Aut}(\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13})\cong\mathbb{Z}_5^*\times\mathbb{Z}_{13}^*$. Since $|\varphi(1)|\mid 9$, it follows that the only non-trivial homomorphism is given by $1\mapsto (1,3)$. This gives rise to the presentation

$$ <a,b,c,d:a^5=b^{13}=c^9=e,ab=ba,ac=ca,cbc^{-1}=b^3>. $$

This has a cyclic subgroup generated by $ac$ whose index is 13. This group has a non-trivial center since $a\in Z(G)$. Moreover, the order of $Z(G)$ is composite since it also contains $c^3$: $c^3bc^{-3}=b^{27}=b$. Hence the order of $Z(G)$ is divisible by 15.

Let's move on to the Case 2 where $G$ is given by $(\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13})\rtimes (\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_3)$. To define the homomorphism, we need to determine where such a homomorphism sends $(1,0)$ and $(0,1)$ of $\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_3$. By the same logic, we determine that either $(1,0)\mapsto (1,3);\,(0,1)\mapsto (1,1)$ OR $(1,0)\mapsto (1,3);\,(0,1)\mapsto (1,3)$. The map $(1,0)\mapsto (1,1);(0,1)\mapsto (1,3)$ gives rise to an isomorphic group.

The corresponding presentations are:

$$ \begin{split} <a,b,c,d &:a^5=b^{13}=c^3=d^3=e,ab=ba,cd=dc,ac=ca,bc=cb,ad=da\\ &;dbd^{-1}=b^3>, \end{split} $$ (namely, $a$ commutes with everything, but $b$ only commutes with $a$ and $c$) and $$ \begin{split} <a,b,c,d &:a^5=b^{13}=c^3=d^3=e,ab=ba,ac=ca,ad=da,cd=dc\\ &;cbc^{-1}=b^3,dbd^{-1}=b^3>. \end{split} $$

Here is where I have the problem (by cheating, shamefully): These two better be isomorphic! But I don't see how they can be isomorphic... Any help?

  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "by cheating, shamefully"? Do you mean you have found out, not by your own effort, that there exists only one nontrivial semidirect product $(\mathbb{Z}_5\times \mathbb{Z}_{13})\rtimes (\mathbb{Z}_3\times\mathbb{Z}_3)$, up to isomorphism? $\endgroup$ – Batominovski Aug 2 '18 at 10:09
  • $\begingroup$ I know that (by referring to another source) that there are only 4 distinct groups of order 585. $\endgroup$ – user134070 Aug 2 '18 at 10:13
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ To show that the two groups are isomorphic, consider $c' = c d$ in the first group, and note that $a, b, c', d$ satisfy the relations of the second group. $\endgroup$ – Andreas Caranti Aug 2 '18 at 11:20

Use (or first prove) the following fact: If $$\varphi,\psi:\ G\ \longrightarrow\ \operatorname{Aut}(H),$$ are two group homomorphisms and $\chi\in\operatorname{Aut}(H)$ is such that $\varphi(g)=\psi(g)\chi$ for all $g\in G$, then $$G\rtimes_{\varphi}H\cong G\rtimes_{\psi}H.$$

For the first case, you have overlooked the homomorphism $$\mathbb{Z}_9\ \longrightarrow\ \mathbb{Z}_5^*\times\mathbb{Z}_{13}^*:\ 1\ \longmapsto\ (1,9),$$ which is not a problem, as it yields a semidirect product isomorphic to the one you found by the result above. For the second case, you have overlooked the nontrivial homomorphisms $$\mathbb{Z}_3\times\Bbb{Z}_3\ \longrightarrow\ \mathbb{Z}_5^*\times\mathbb{Z}_{13}^*:\ \begin{array}{c} (0,1)\ \longmapsto\ (1,1)\\ (1,0)\ \longmapsto\ (1,9) \end{array},$$ $$\mathbb{Z}_3\times\Bbb{Z}_3\ \longrightarrow\ \mathbb{Z}_5^*\times\mathbb{Z}_{13}^*:\ \begin{array}{c} (0,1)\ \longmapsto\ (1,3)\\ (1,0)\ \longmapsto\ (1,9) \end{array},$$ $$\mathbb{Z}_3\times\Bbb{Z}_3\ \longrightarrow\ \mathbb{Z}_5^*\times\mathbb{Z}_{13}^*:\ \begin{array}{c} (0,1)\ \longmapsto\ (1,9)\\ (1,0)\ \longmapsto\ (1,1) \end{array},$$ $$\mathbb{Z}_3\times\Bbb{Z}_3\ \longrightarrow\ \mathbb{Z}_5^*\times\mathbb{Z}_{13}^*:\ \begin{array}{c} (0,1)\ \longmapsto\ (1,9)\\ (1,0)\ \longmapsto\ (1,3) \end{array},$$ $$\mathbb{Z}_3\times\Bbb{Z}_3\ \longrightarrow\ \mathbb{Z}_5^*\times\mathbb{Z}_{13}^*:\ \begin{array}{c} (0,1)\ \longmapsto\ (1,9)\\ (1,0)\ \longmapsto\ (1,9) \end{array},$$ which is again not a problem, as they yield semidirect products isomorphic to the one you found, again by the result above.

I'm also a bit surprised by your abstract approach of semidirect products. In stead of working with presentations, why not work with concrete sets with concrete operations? For example, the semidirect product $(\Bbb{Z}_5\times\Bbb{Z}_{13})\rtimes\Bbb{Z}_9$ can be constructed as the set $(\Bbb{Z}_5\times\Bbb{Z}_{13})\times\Bbb{Z}_9$ with operation $$((a_1,b_1),c_1)\cdot((a_2,b_2),c_2)=((a_1+a_2,b_1+3^{c_1}b_2),c_1+c_2).$$ This makes it much easier to see whether two given semidirect products are isomorphic.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.