0
$\begingroup$

A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 4.14

This text talks about winding numbers in Def 1.17. In the textbook, I think Exer 4.13 refers to winding numbers.

enter image description here

  1. Does Exer 4.13 refer to winding numbers, and is the $m$ in Exer 4.14 a winding number of $\gamma$?
  2. Can I choose unit circle but keep it winding $m-1$ more times, i.e. $\gamma(t) = e^{it}, t \in [0,2 m\pi]$? I mean it doesn't say simple $\gamma$.

  3. Actually, how about $\gamma=\gamma_1\gamma_2 \cdots \gamma_m$ where $\gamma_2, \dots, \gamma_m$ are copies of a closed simple path $\gamma_1$ s.t. $0 \in int(\gamma_1)$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes. Yes, as long as $m$ is positive: what if $m\le0$? $\endgroup$ – Lord Shark the Unknown Aug 1 '18 at 14:49
  • $\begingroup$ Nice try, @LordSharktheUnknown. $m>0$ and in fact $m \in \mathbb Z$ because otherwise $\gamma=\gamma_1\gamma_2 \cdots \gamma_m$ wouldn't make sense :P (I guess?) Thanks! $\endgroup$ – BCLC Aug 1 '18 at 14:53
1
$\begingroup$

In 4.13, for $n = -1$ you have the winding number of $\gamma$ about the origin. An immediate reason the others are zero is that for $n \not= -1$, $z^n$ is a derivative.

For your second question, the answer is yes.

For your third question, the answer is __ BCLC: yes I guess? ___.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Edit: I split up 2 into 2 and 3. Any changes please? Thanks ncmathsadist! $\endgroup$ – BCLC Aug 1 '18 at 14:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 3 works as well. $\endgroup$ – ncmathsadist Aug 1 '18 at 14:57
  • $\begingroup$ ncmathsadist, wait edited 3. I think I have to let 0∈int(γ1). Now 3 is right but previously 3 was wrong? $\endgroup$ – BCLC Aug 1 '18 at 15:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.