Difference Between Zero-Dimensional and Totally Separated in the Plane In Michael Coornaert's book 'Topological Dimension and Dynamical Systems' he mentions the existence of a set $X$ in the plane that is totally separated, but not zero-dimensional.  He says it is due to Sierpinski, but the paper he cites is in French.  The example doesn't seem to be in Steen & Seebach; is anyone familiar?
Here, 'totally separated' means that the quasicomponents of $X$ are points.  Equivalently, for any $x, y \in X$ there is a separation of $X$ into disjoint open sets $U, V$ such that $x \in U$ and $y \in V$.
The Sierpinski paper is here: https://eudml.org/doc/212954
A zero-dimensional space in this context can equivalently mean a space with a clopen basis, a space all of whose points have a clopen basis, or a space with arbitrarily fine covers by disjoint open sets.
EDIT: David Hartley below has described Sierpinski's space satisfying the desired requirements.  I've attached a (bad) drawing.

 A: The example in the Sierpinski paper quoted is quite different from his carpet, except it also uses lots of rectangles. Here's a brief sketch of the construction. It uses repeated applications of the following procedure, illustrated on the rectangle with corners at $(\pm1,\pm1)$.   Let $R(2n-1)$ be the rectangle in the top-left quarter bounded by $y=0,y=1,x=-(2^{-(2n-2)})$ and $x=-(2^{-(2n-1)})$. Let $R(2n)$ be the matching rectangle 
in the bottom-right quarter (rotate 180 about origin). The same procedure, 
scaled appropriately, is repeated in each $R(n_1)$ to give rectangles $R(n_1,n_2)$ and again within those, and so on, giving $R(n_1, n_2,..,n_k)$ for any natural k. 
Let $S_k$ be the union of all these rectangles with k indices and P be the 
intersection of all $S_k$. Let Q be the set containing the centres of all the 
defined rectangles and $E = P \cup Q$.
$E$ is totally separated but not zero-dimensional. In particular, any clopen 
set containing the centre of the outer rectangle has the mid-points of the 
top and bottom sides in its closure in $\mathbb R^2$ (they are not in $E$) and so has 
diameter at least 2. Hence the centre point cannot have a nbhd. basis of clopen sets.
Adding one of those mid-points to $E$ forms $E_1$ which cannot be totally 
separated but remains totally disconnected.
