0
$\begingroup$

A First Course in Complex Analysis by Matthias Beck, Gerald Marchesi, Dennis Pixton, and Lucas Sabalka Exer 1.31,32

enter image description here


Perhaps related but my topology is so far limited to the elementary topology in elementary analysis, complex analysis and real analysis: union-of-connected-subsets-is-connected-if-intersection-is-nonempty, Union of connected subsets is connected if intersection is nonempty


Pf:

Let $A$ and $B$ be the regions in question.

  1. Their union is open is because they are each open. If that warrants further justification, then: any element in their union has a disc centred at the element that is contained entirely in A or in B and hence in A or B.

  2. Suppose on the contrary that their union is not connected. Then $\exists C_1, C_2, C_3, C_4$ s.t. $C_1 \cup C_2 = A \cup B, C_1 \ne \emptyset \ne C_2, C_3 = C_3^0, C_4=C_4^0, C_1 \subseteq C_3, C_2 \subseteq C_4$ and $C_3 \cap C_4 = \emptyset$.

We deduce that $\emptyset = C_1 \cap C_2$, and so we have 4 cases:

Case 1: $A \cup B \subseteq C_1$

$A \cup B \subset$ but $\ne C_1 \cup C_2$ ↯

Case 2: $A \cup B \subseteq C_2$

$A \cup B \subset$ but $\ne C_1 \cup C_2$ ↯

Case 3: $A \subseteq C_1, B \subseteq C_2$

$A \cap B = \emptyset$ ↯

Case 4: $A \subseteq C_1, B \subseteq C_2$

$A \cap B = \emptyset$ ↯

The cases are exhaustive and each lead to a contradiction. $\therefore,$ their union is connected. QED


enter image description here


For the former my proof is:

Definitions:

$$z \in \partial A \iff \exists \ r>0:D[z,r]\cap A \ne \emptyset \ne D[z,r]\cap A^c$$

$$z \in \partial B \iff \exists \ r>0:D[z,r]\cap B \ne \emptyset \ne D[z,r]\cap B^c$$

$$B \ \text{is closed} \iff \partial B \subseteq B \iff B = B^0 \cup \partial B$$

Now observe for $D[z,r]\cap A$:

$$D[z,r]\cap A \subseteq A \subseteq B \implies D[z,r]\cap B \ne \emptyset$$

Thus for $D[z,r]\cap A^c$:

$$D[z,r]\cap A^c \subseteq B \iff D[z,r] \subseteq B \iff z \in B^0$$

$$D[z,r]\cap A^c \subsetneq B \iff D[z,r]\cap B^c \ne \emptyset \iff z \in \partial B$$

In either case $z \in B$. QED


For the latter my proof is:

$$\forall z \in A=A^0, \exists \ a>0: D[z,a] \subset A =A^0 \subseteq B$$

Now $$z \in B^0 \iff \exists \ b>0:D[z,b] \subseteq B$$

Choose $b=a$. QED


Where have I gone wrong?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

In any space let $F$ be a non-empty family of connected open sets such that $\cap F\ne \emptyset.$ Let $A, B$ be disjoint open sets with $A\cup B=\cup F.$

For each $f\in F,$ the sets $f\cap A , f\cap B$ are disjoint open subsets of the connected set $f,$ and their union is $f$. So $$(1)...\quad f\cap A\ne \emptyset \implies f=f\cap A \quad \text { and } \quad f\cap B\ne \emptyset \implies f=f\cap B.$$ By contradiction, suppose $A\ne \emptyset \ne B.$ Since $A=\cup_{f\in F}(f\cap A)$ and $B=\cup_{f\in F}(f\cap B),$ there exist $f_A,f_B\in F$ such that $f_A\cap A\ne \emptyset \ne f_B\cap B.$

Then by $(1)$ we have $\cap F\subset f_A\cap f_B=(f_A\cap A)\cap (f_B\cap B)\subset A\cap B=\emptyset,$ contrary to $\emptyset \ne \cap F.$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks DanielWainfleet! I'll analyse later $\endgroup$ – BCLC Aug 5 '18 at 11:53
0
$\begingroup$

Any union of connected sets with a not empty intersection
is connected. Use the theorem that K is connected iff for
all continuous f:K -> discrete {0,1}, f is constant.

If C is a collection of connected sets, a in $\cap$C,
and f:$\cup$C -> {0,1} continuous, then for all K in C,
f(K) = {f(a)}. Whereupon, f($\cup$C) = {f(a)}.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ 'my topology is so far limited to the elementary topology in elementary analysis, complex analysis and real analysis'... $\endgroup$ – BCLC Jul 30 '18 at 0:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.