Why can $y=0$ be considered the asymptote of $f(x)=\frac{\sin x}{x}$? Why can $y=0$ be considered the asymptote of $f(x)=\frac{\sin x}{x}$ when the two graphs don't get any closer when $x$ approaches infinity? Because isn't the asymptote something that a graph will touch and stay on once the graph reaches infinity? And yet, in $f(x)=\frac{\sin x}{x}$, the size of $x$ has no effect on the graph's proximity to the asymptote. It just keeps fluctuating around $y=0$! So that suggests that the graph won't touch and stay on the asymptote at infinity? And if it doesn't, how can $y=0$ still be considered the asymptote of $f(x)=\frac{\sin x}{x}$? 
 A: There are several misconceptions in your post.
$$\frac{\sin x}{x}$$ does get closer and closer to $0$ when $x$ increases. In fact,
$$\left|\frac{\sin x}{x}\right|\le\frac1x$$ and the RHS clearly tends to $0$.
"... isn't the asymptote something that a graph will touch and stay on ...": no, quite often an asymptote doesn't touch the curve. It just needs to come arbitrarily close. In the case at hand, it crosses it infinitely often, but this does not matter.
A: I have already written to you about this. Look at the graph of your function:

Don't you agree that, as we move to the right, the graph gets closer to $0$? To be more precise, if we fix a number $\varepsilon>0$, then, if $M$ is large enough, the graph of the restriction of $f$ to $[M,+\infty)$ is between the lines $y=\varepsilon$ and $y=-\varepsilon$. That's what it means that the line $y=0$ is an asymptote of the graph of $f$.
A: The definition of an horizontal asymptote is that 
$$\lim\limits_{x \to \infty} f(x) = c.$$
Which is exactly the case here with $c=0$.
In no way the definition of an asymptote implies that the function is supposed to stay on the same side of the asymptote for $x$ large enough.
A: 
f(x)=sinx/x, the size of x has no effect on the graph's proximity to the asymptote.

Yes it does:
$$\text{max}_{x>x_0}\left|\frac{\sin(x)}{x}-0\right|\leq \frac{1}{x_0}$$
