Let $\mathbb{B}$ be a boolean algebra. Then we know that $\mathbb{B}$ is isomorphic to an algebra of sets, viz. ${h:\mathbb{B}\longrightarrow \mathrm{Clopen}(\mathrm{Ult}(\mathbb{B}))\subseteq\wp(\mathrm{Ult}(\mathbb{B}))}$ via $h(b)=U_{b}=\{\mathfrak{F}\in\mathrm{Ult}(\mathbb{B})\mid b\in\mathfrak{F}\}$.

I want to know, whether there is a powerset algebra $\wp(X)$ and an epimorphism, ${g:\wp(X)\longrightarrow\mathbb{B}}$. This is equivalent to the question: is there a powerset algebra $\wp(X)$ and an ideal $\mathcal{I}\subseteq \wp(X)$, such that $\mathbb{B}\cong\wp(X)/\mathcal{I}$.

I am also aware of the Loomis-Sikorski Theorem: Every $\sigma$-complete Boolean algebra is isomorphic to the a quotient $\mathbf{F}/\mathcal{I}$, where $\mathbf{F}$ is a $σ$-field of sets and $\mathcal{I}\subseteq\mathbf{F}$ is a $\sigma$-ideal. Is there an equivalent theorem for complete boolean algebras?

UPDATE: Answered by @Keith Kearnes here [https://mathoverflow.net/questions/306578/is-every-complete-boolean-algebra-isomorphic-to-the-quotient-of-a-powerset-algeb].

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Simultaneous crosspost to MathOF: mathoverflow.net/questions/306578/… $\endgroup$ – YCor Jul 22 '18 at 9:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The Cantor set is not homeomorphic to a closed subset of a Stone-Cech compactification of a discrete set (since any converging sequence therein is eventually constant). By Stone duality, this reflects in the fact that the corresponding Boolean algebra is not quotient of a power set (@მამუკაჯიბლაძე 's argument yields something more general but I wanted to point out this topological interpretation). $\endgroup$ – YCor Jul 22 '18 at 9:36
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor on which site is it better to post? $\endgroup$ – Thomas Jul 22 '18 at 9:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not on both. I'd say, on MathSE, and then if no answers after a few days, on MathOF, with links in both directions (and taking into account relevant comments to the MathSE post, if applicable). $\endgroup$ – YCor Jul 22 '18 at 10:08

A free algebra on an infinite set is not complete (exercise). If it would be a quotient of a powerset it would be a retract of it (exercise), and a retract of a complete algebra is complete (exercise).

Practically the same argument shows that the same algebra is also not a quotient of any countably complete one.

Another argument uses the fact that images of atoms under surjective homomorphisms are either 0 or atoms themselves.

Since there is some controversy in comments, let me try to supply an argument for that. Take $\pi:P\twoheadrightarrow B$ and suppose $a\in P$ is an atom. Take any $x\leqslant\pi(a)$. Choose $y\in P$ with $\pi(y)=x$. Then also $\pi(a\land y)=x$ (since $\pi(a\land y)=\pi(a)\land\pi(y)=\pi(a)\land x=x$).

Now since $a$ is an atom, either $a\land y=a$ or $a\land y=0$, so that either $x=\pi(a)$ or $x=0$.

However to the contrary of what I stated, this does not imply that an atomless algebra cannot be quotient of a powerset; thanks to JDH for noticing that.

In fact for complete algebras the answer seems to be positive. In fact there is a theorem by Sikorski that injective objects in Boolean algebras are precisely the complete ones. Thus any embedding $i:B\hookrightarrow P$ of a complete Boolean algebra $B$ as a subalgebra of any Boolean algebra $P$ admits a retraction $\pi:P\twoheadrightarrow B$ (i. e. $\pi i$ is identity). Thus in fact any complete Boolean algebra is a retract of a powerset.

A proof can be found on planetmath. Note that it uses AC; that planetmath page claims that it is not known whether AC is unavoidable.

I believe also that not every quotient of a powerset is complete, i. e. retract - e. g. I think quotient by the ideal of finite subsets is not complete.

  • $\begingroup$ Okay, thanks. Now I’m concerned about just the complete boolean algebras. Are they isomorphic to quotients of powerset algebras? $\endgroup$ – Thomas Jul 22 '18 at 9:45
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In the final remarks of your answer, you seem to suggest that $P(X)/I$ can not be an atomless complete Boolean algebra. But this is not true, since for example the instance of $P(\omega_1)$ modulo the non-stationary ideal NS is studied in set theory, and under certain large cardinal assumptions this can be complete (and it is atomless). Have I misunderstood something? $\endgroup$ – JDH Jul 22 '18 at 11:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @მამუკაჯიბლაძე your argument holds in terms of complete Boolean algebras (cBA). That is, there is no cBA-epimorphism $h:\wp(X)\longrightarrow\mathbb{B}$, if $\mathbb{B}$ is atomless, since then necessarily $h(\{x\})=0$ for all $x\in X$ and since $h$ is a cBA-morphism $1=h(X)=\bigvee\{h(x):x\in X\}=0$, which is a contradiction. However this does not exclude morphisms in the category BA, since the last argument cannot be executed for general BA-morphisms. Thus the question remains: is every (complete) BA isomorphic to a quotient of a powerset algebra within the category BA. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Jul 22 '18 at 11:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I wasn't objecting to your claims about images of atoms, which are fine. I am objecting to your claims that P(X)/I cannot be atomless and complete, since this isn't true. $\endgroup$ – JDH Jul 22 '18 at 12:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JDH Ok hopefully this is now correct. Many thanks for pointing it out! $\endgroup$ – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე Jul 22 '18 at 12:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.