A standard fact in commutative algebra:

Let $A$ be a ring in which there exists some finite number of maximal ideals whose product is $0$. Then $A$ is Artinian iff $A$ is Noetherian.

The usual proof involves noting that each $\frac{m_1...m_{i-1}}{m_1...m_i}$ is naturally an $\frac{A}{m_i}$-module. You look at a short exact sequence $$0 \rightarrow m_1...m_i \rightarrow m_1...m_{i-1} \rightarrow \frac{m_1...m_{i-1}}{m_1...m_i} \rightarrow 0 $$

and argue that the middle module is Artinian/Noetherian iff the other two are Artinian/Noetherian. Then by decreasing induction, each $m_1...m_i$ is Artinian iff it is Noetherian. In particular, for $i=0$, you get the desired result.

My question is, why is it OK to conflate $A$ being Noetherian (over itself), and $A$ being Noetherian as an $\frac{A}{m_i}$-module?

Surely there's a difference between the notion of being Artinian/Noetherian as $\frac{A}{m_i}$-modules, and being Artinian/Noetherian as $A$-modules. So for instance how can we justify using the assumption that the $\frac{A}{m_i}$-module $\frac{m_1...m_{i-1}}{m_1...m_i}$ is Noetherian to deduce anything about $A$ being Noetherian as a module over itself?

(For full details of the standard proof see Lemma 2.15 here: https://people.kth.se/~laksov/courses/algebradr01/notes/chains2.pdf)


If $A$ is a commutative ring, $m$ an ideal of $A$, then the following hold:

  • if $M$ is an $A$-module with $mM = 0$, then $M$ is an $A/m$-module
  • if $M$ is an $A/m$-module, then $M$ is an $A$-module

With these in mind, if $M$ is an $A$-module with $mM = 0$, then the $A$-submodules of $M$ are precisely the $A/m$-submodules of $M$, and so $M$ is Artinian (resp. Noetherian) as an $A$-module if and only if it is Artinian (resp. Noetherian) as an $A/m$-module.

As explained in the linked proof, it is clear that $\frac{m_1...m_{i-1}}{m_1...m_i}$ is Artinian as an $A/m_i$-module iff it is Noetherian as an $A/m_i$-module (since $A/m_i$ is a field), and so by the previous part it is Artinian as an $A$-module iff it is Noetherian as an $A$-module.

Then consider the short exact sequence of $A$-modules $$0 \rightarrow m_1...m_i \rightarrow m_1...m_{i-1} \rightarrow \frac{m_1...m_{i-1}}{m_1...m_i} \rightarrow 0 $$ and apply induction as you describe.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.