0
$\begingroup$

I was reading some notes on Geometric Group Theory from a seminar, and I came across a statement that reminded me of a pumping lemma. First of all I'll give some definitions and then I'll ask a couple of question on that statement and one of its implications.

Notation: Let $G$ an infinite finitely generated group. For $g\in G$ and a finite generating set $X\subseteq G$, I denote $|g|_X$ the distance from $1_G$ to $g$ on the Cayley graph of $G$ with respect to $X$. By $w_g$ I denote the word of minimum lenght representing $g$ in $G$ and by $l(w)$ I denote the length of the word $w$.

Definition: A word $w=x_1\cdots x_n$ is said to be $p$-periodic if $x_i=x_{i+p}$ for $1\leq i\leq n-p$.

Definition: The growth function of $G$ with respect to $X$ is defined by $\beta_{(G,X)}(n)=\#\{g\in G\mid |g|_X\leq n\}$.

The statement is the following

Given $m\in\mathbb{N}$ and $g\in G$ with $|g|_X\geq 2m$, there exist words $u_g,v_g,s_g$ such that $l(u_g),l(v_g)\leq m$, $s_g$ is $p$-periodic with $p\leq m$ and $w_g=u_gs_gv_g$.

This statement appears in a proof of: the growth function of $G$ is of the order of a degree 1 polynomial implies that $G$ contains an infinite cyclic subgroup of finite index.

First of all, this statement reminds me of the pumping lemma for regular languages, so I would like to know whether this is a known result with a name and if it is indeed related with some pumping lemma.

Sencondly, there is the following explanation:

We observe that the above statement implies the existence of elements of strictly high order. We have $l(s_g)\geq |g|_X-2m$ and $s_g=t_g^ks_g'$ with $t_g\in G$ such that $|t_g|_X=p\leq m$ and $t_g$ has order $>k$. Since there are finitely many choices of $t_g$, there must be one of infinite order.

I think it should be $l(w_{t_g})=p$ and not necessarily $|t_g|=p$, since $t_g$ is represented by the word that is repeated in $s_g$. Furtheremore, I don't understand what is meant by "there are finitely many choices of $t_g$" since there is only one $t_g$ for each word $s_g$, and I don't see why this implies that there is some element of infinite order.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, this appears inside a proof, so I'll add those hypothesis @LeeMosher $\endgroup$ – Javi Jul 18 '18 at 15:51
  • $\begingroup$ It feels like there's an inequality or quantifier reversed somewhere in the first statement - as written we can just take $m=1$ and say that all words $w$ in $G$ other than the generators are of the form $x_ax_b^nx_c$ and that surely isn't correct. $\endgroup$ – Steven Stadnicki Jul 18 '18 at 16:07
  • $\begingroup$ I copied it just like it was stated so I don't know what is wrong. Perhaps some quantifier on $m$ is needed. @StevenStadnicki $\endgroup$ – Javi Jul 18 '18 at 16:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To answer your question about whether this is a known result with a name, I know of no such result or name. Also, knowing that this lemma is appearing only in the middle of the proof you mention, I'm sure there is no need for a general name, because the class of groups that possess a cyclic subgroup of finite index is an extremely special class of groups. $\endgroup$ – Lee Mosher Jul 20 '18 at 17:34
1
$\begingroup$

When it says there are finitely many choices for $t_g$ it just means there are finitely many words of length $p$. If all elements represented by words in the finite set $\{t_g|\,g\in G\}$ have finite order, then for any $g\in G$ \begin{align} |g|_X&=l(w_g)\\ &=l(u_g)+l(v_g)+l(s'_g)+l(t_g^k)\\ &\leq 2m+p+p\max_{g\in G} o(t_g),\\ &<\infty \end{align} where $o(w_g)$ denotes the order of $g$, but this contradicts $G$ being infinite.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.