Exemplified by this question and its comment, there seems to be a near-universal preference for the substitutions $\sin(\theta)$, $\tan(\theta)$, $\sec(\theta)$, $\sinh(\theta)$, $\cosh(\theta)$, and $\tanh(\theta)$ as opposed to $\cos(\theta)$, $\csc(\theta)$, $\cot(\theta)$, $\mathrm{sech}(\theta)$, $\mathrm{csch}(\theta)$, or $\tanh(\theta)$.
Why the preference of one half dozen over the other, and why is there an asymmetry between the specific trig functions and the specific hyperbolic functions that are preferred (I am not asking about the general difference between the two categories, as asked in the linked question, but why, i.e., $\sec(\theta)$ is privileged over $\mathrm{sech}(\theta)$)? Finally, is it viable to use any of the more exotic trig functions or their hyperbolic counterparts, or even an inverse trig/hyberbolic function for such a substitution?