The problem.

Consider the lattice $\mathbf{M}_3$ below

enter image description here

Clearly, this is the lattice of subgroups of $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$ (isomorphic to the Klein four-group $\mathbf{V}_4$), taking $A = \langle (0,1) \rangle$, $B = \langle (1,0) \rangle$ and $C = \langle (1,1) \rangle$.
I want to show that, up to isomorphism, this is the only group $G$ having $\mathbf{M}_3$ as its lattice of subgroups.

My solution.

To start with, clearly $G$ is finite.
In this case, since $$A \cap B = B \cap C = C \cap A = \{1\},$$ we have that $$|AB| = |A|\cdot |B|, \quad |BC| = |B|\cdot|C|, \quad |CA|=|C|\cdot|A|,$$ and $$|G| = (|A|-1) + (|B|-1) + (|C|-1) + 1 = |A|+|B|+|C|-2.$$ Since $A,B,C$ are minimal, they are cyclic of prime orders, $p_A, p_B, p_C$.

First case. Suppose that $p_A, p_B, p_C$ are all different.
As conjugate subgroups are isomorphic, it follows that $A,B,C \triangleleft G$, whence $AB, BC, CA \leq G$ and thus, in our specific case, $AB=BC=CA = G$, yielding $$|G| = p_Ap_B = p_Bp_C = p_Cp_A,$$ whence $p_A=p_B=p_C$, a contradiction with the hypothesis.

Second case. Suppose $p_A \neq p_B=p_C$.
In this case $A \triangleleft G$, whence $AB, AC \leq G$ and $|G| = |A|\cdot|B| = p_Ap_B$.
By the First Theorem of Sylow, $G$ has a Sylow $p_B$-subgroup $P$ of order $p_B$.
Necessarily $P=B$ or $P=C$ and since $|B|=|C|$, they both are Sylow $p_B$-subgroups of $G$ and $n_{p_B}=2$.
By the Third Theorem of Sylow, $n_{p_B} | p_A$, whence $p_A=2$ and $|G|=2p_B$. So $$p_B^2 = |BC| \leq 2p_B,$$ whence $p_B \leq 2$ and thus, $p_A=p_B=p_C=2$, again, a contradiction.

Third case. Suppose that $p_A=p_B=p_C=p$.
If $q \neq p$ is another prime number dividing $|G|$, then $G$ has a Sylow $q$-subgroup, which is a contradiction because all proper non-trivial subgroups of $G$ have order $p$. Hence $$|G|=p^r,$$ for some $r>1$ (it can't be $r=1$ because $G$ has non-trivial proper subgroups). $$r \geq 2 \quad\text{because}\quad p^2 = |AB| \leq |G|,$$ $$r \leq 3 \quad\text{because}\quad |G| \leq |A|\cdot |B|\cdot|C|.$$ Recall that, in this case, $|G|=3p-2$.
If $|G|=p^3$, then $$0 = p^3 -3p + 2 = (p+2)(p-1)^2,$$ whence $p=-2$, which is, of course, impossible;
or $p=1$ which is not a prime (and $G$ would be trivial).
Therefore $|G|=p^2$ and $$0 = p^2 - 3p + 2 = (p - 1)(p - 2),$$ yielding $p=2$, since, again, $G$ is not trivial.
So $|A|=|B|=|C|=2$ and thus $G$ is an exponent $2$ group, whence abelian and having order $4$. This is enough to fully determine $G$.

My questions.

  • I suspect that there is a much simpler proof, without going through all those cases and using elementary group theory (but I'm not claiming this one's advanced...). I would welcome a concise (and elementary) proof even if you don't want to take the time to read through all the above.
  • Anyway, is this all right?

Thanks in advance!


I think what you say is right. Let me offer you a different approach which would let you attack more general cases when $3$ is replaced by something larger e.g 4, or ...or 8, or whatever you care to try.

As you know the only groups with no non-trivial proper subgroups are cyclic of prime order. So we may assume $|A|=p$, $|B|=q$, $|C|=r$, where $p,q,r$ are primes and without loss of generality $p\geqslant q \geqslant r$.

Now $A$ acts by conjugation on the set of minimal subgroups of our group $G$. It fixes $A$ of course, and permutes the others in orbits of length $1$ or $p$.

Suppose that $p>2$. Then $A$ has to fix each of $B$ and $C$ since $2<p$. Now $A$ will act on the elements of $B$ by conjugation: it will fix the identity $1$ and must permute the $q-1$ others in orbits of length $1$ or $p$. As $q-1<p$ it will therefore fix each of them. That is, if we take generators of $A$ and $B$ we have elements of order $p$ and $q$ which commute; they generate a subgroup containing $A$ and $B$ which is therefore $G$. So $G$ is abelian of order $pq$.If $q=p$ then we have a contradiction: the cyclic group of order $p^2$ has only one non-trivial proper subgroup, and the elementary abelian group of order $p^2$ has $(p+1)$ subgroups of order $p$.

We therefore have that $p=2$ and so $p=q=r=2$. The order of $G$ is now $4$. The cyclic group has only one subgroup of order $p$, the Klein group has the structure we want.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.