2
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have two monic polynomials with real coefficients \begin{align*} & p_1(t) = t^n + a_{n-1} t^{n-1} + \dots + a_0 \\ & p_2(t) = t^n + b_{n-1} t^{n-1} + \dots + b_0. \end{align*} Further assume $p_1(t)$ and $p_2(t)$ are both Hurwitz stable, i.e., the roots are all lying on the open left half plane of $\mathbb C$; equivalently, real parts of all roots are $<0$.

I am wondering whether or not there is some $M < 0$ (existence of such $M$ is enough) such that if the real parts of all roots smaller than $M$, then the convex combination of the two polynomials is Hurwitz stable.

Intuitively, I am thinking by making real parts of roots "negative" enough, the convex combination would stay in the left half plane.

p.s. Routh-Hurwitz Theorem gives sufficient condition to determine whether a polynomial is Hurwitz stable. But the rule seems complicated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It doesn't really help, but it is straightforward to see that the convex combination has no real non negative zeros. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jul 14 '18 at 4:45
  • $\begingroup$ Note that $p_k(t) \to \infty $ as $ t \to \infty$, and there are no zeros in $t \ge 0$, hence $p_k(t) >0$ for all $t \ge 0$. Hence any convex combination is also strictly positive. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jul 14 '18 at 5:30
  • $\begingroup$ I thought I had an answer using $\det$ and the associated companion matrix but forgot that the $\det$ may be non real which blew that approach. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jul 14 '18 at 5:33
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. I am curious what approach you were considering. If you put companion form, why would the $\det$ be non real since the coefficients are real in my setting? $\endgroup$ – user1101010 Jul 14 '18 at 5:39
  • $\begingroup$ I deleted a non answer. I was thinking that the two $\det$s were not zero in the right half plane hence the convex combination would not be. However, this only works if the $\det$ was real. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jul 14 '18 at 5:47
2
+50
$\begingroup$

As shown in this answer, the sum of two stable polynomials does not have to be stable. The example given there is that, for $a>11$, the polynomial $(x+1)^3 + (x+a)$ has roots in the right half plane, although $(x+1)^3$ and $x+a$ are stable (and even have their roots real!).

This is easily adapted to give a counterexample to your question: For any positive real $M$ and any $a>11$, the polynomials $(x+M)^3$ and $(x+aM)$ have roots with real part $<M$, but their sum has roots with positive real part.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.