5
$\begingroup$

Consider $Q_3$ field which is rational number $Q$ completed at $p=3$.(In other words, $Q_3$ is $3-$adic rational numbers.) Let $f=x^3-17\in Q_3[x]$. Let $O$ be the complete DVR associated to $Q_3$.

Clearly $f\in O[x]$. From Gauss lemma by $O$ PID, I see that if $f=gh,g,h\in Q_3[x]$,then $g,h\in O[x]$. Therefore, I can perform $3-$reduction by considering $\frac{O}{3}[x]$.

Now $\bar{f}\in Z_3[x]$ has $x^3+1=(x+1)^3\in Z_3[x]$. So I cannot apply hensel lemma here to determine factor of $f$ in $Q_3[x]$. The book says it has a degree 2 irreducible factor in $Q_3[x]$.

The other version of Hensel uses $f'(x)=3x^2$. And $x=-1$ yields $3^2\vert f(-1)$ and $3^2\not\vert f'(x)$ but $2=1+1$. The absolute value requires $|f(-1)|<|f'(-1)|^2$ where $|x|$ is the $\frac{1}{3^{v_3(x)}}$ and $v_3(x)$ is $3-$adic valuation of $x\in Q_3$. Both sides yields $\frac{1}{9}$ for absolute value. So I cannot apply this hensel lifting.

$\textbf{Q:}$ Can someone kindly provide hints to methods to determine reducibility for local fields? If I am lucky, I can proceed by hensel lemma but it requires factors after prime reduction being coprime. Have I done something wrong above?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps take a look at some of the solutions to this question regarding how to find the root in $\Bbb{Z}_3$. $\endgroup$ – sharding4 Jul 8 '18 at 0:12
  • $\begingroup$ @sharding4 So the trick is to look at the transformed polynomial as one normally plays Eisenstein criterion? $\endgroup$ – user45765 Jul 8 '18 at 0:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes. I think you may be able to find a slicker approach along those lines. If not, you can slog through it using the method I used in the question referenced above. $x\equiv 2 \pmod 3$ lifts because $(3k+2)^3 \equiv 17 \pmod 9$ is identically true. The calculation just becomes messy and tedious. $\endgroup$ – sharding4 Jul 8 '18 at 0:21
  • $\begingroup$ @sharding4 Thanks for the info. $\endgroup$ – user45765 Jul 8 '18 at 0:24
  • $\begingroup$ No problem. With a little cheat on the computer I found $1/3 \sqrt[3]{17^2}-1/3\sqrt[3]{17}+1/3$ has minimal polynomial $g(x)=x^3-x^2+6x-12$. You can more easily find a root of that polynomial using Hensel's Lemma or some other method of your choice. Then $\sqrt[3]{17}=1/2\alpha^2-1/2\alpha+2$ where $\alpha$ is the root of $g$ that you found. $\endgroup$ – sharding4 Jul 8 '18 at 0:31
3
$\begingroup$

Here’s a method of using Strong Hensel, which you seem to know:

The cubic $X^3-17=f(X)$ has a root if and only if $f(X-1)=X^3-3X^2+3X-18$ has a root. Three-adically, the Newton polygon has a vertex at $(1,1)$, which already tells you that there’s a factorization.

If you’re not comfortable with Newton , go one step further, and substitute $3X$ for $X$, to get $f(3X-1)=27X^3-27X^2+9X-18=9\left(3X^3-3X^2+X-2\right)$. Modulo $3$, we get $3X^3-3X^2+X-2\equiv X-2\pmod3$, and this has the nice factorization $(X-2)\cdot1$ into two relatively prime factors. You can lift one of them to characteristic zero, by Strong Hensel, preserving its degree. Of course you choose the $X-1$. And there you have it.

In case you’re nervous about using $1$ as one of the factors, let me reassure you. This freedom comes in handy surprisingly often.

EDIT: Addendum

You asked about the factorization of $f(X)=X^3-17$ modulo $3$ and why that didn’t tell the splitting of $(3)$ in $\Bbb Q(w)$, where $\text{Irr}(w,\Bbb Q[X])=X^3-17=f(X)$. The theorem should read that the splitting of the irreducible modulo $p$ tells the splitting of $(p)$ only when the root $r$ generates the integers of $\Bbb Q(r)$ over $\Bbb Z$. And of course $r=w$ doesn’t do that.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This might be a dumb follow up question. For local field $Q_3$, the factorization of $x^3-17$ indicates existence of two primes above $(3)$ via extension and one of which is ramified. However, for number field $Q((17)^{1/3})$, the ramification of $(3)$ in number ring of $Q((17)^{1/3})$ shows that there is only 1 prime as $x^3-17$ reduction by $(3)$ becomes $(x+1)^3$ and this indicates prime total ramification. Should I have local prime and global prime correspondence? Or did I make wrong observation here. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – user45765 Jul 8 '18 at 3:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You’re probably misapplying the relevant theorem. The factorization, calling $w=\sqrt[3]{17}$, is $(X-w)(X^2+wX+w^2)$, which does reduce, modulo $3$, to $X^3-1$, it’s true; but this factorization also shows that the other prime above $3$ has to do with a primitive cube root of $1$. In fact, over $\Bbb Q$, the splitting of $(3)$ in $\Bbb Q(w)$ is: a prime of degree one (unramified) corresponding to the linear factor, and a ramified prime with $e=2$ for the quadratic factor. That’s the source of the ramification! (Maybe I’ll make an addition to the Answer, when I get time.) $\endgroup$ – Lubin Jul 8 '18 at 14:07
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, Thanks a lot for the clarification. I got a different answer from my friend who used global approach yielding a totally ramified prime and I was checking the ramification from local field approach which I should get one ramified and one unramified prime. That is why I was trying to look at the local field reducibility of $x^3-17$. $\endgroup$ – user45765 Jul 8 '18 at 14:23
  • $\begingroup$ One final comment: an integral basis is $\{1,w,(w^2-w+1)/3\}$, and this basis shows the (global) discriminant to be $3\cdot17^2$. $\endgroup$ – Lubin Jul 8 '18 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. That is given at the end of Marcus Number fields, Chapter 2. That discriminant gives $pq^2$ factorization as well by Chapter 3, exercise 21b). $\endgroup$ – user45765 Jul 8 '18 at 20:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.