I remember being told that this was true by a professor, but I haven't been able to find a source for it yet.

In the theorem as stated, $\mathbb{F}$ is any field and $T_n(\mathbb{F})$ denotes the algebra of upper triangular $n\times n$ matrices over $\mathbb{F}$.

Theorem: Let $A,B\in T_n(\mathbb{F})$ be such that for all $X\in T_n(\mathbb{F})$, $$AX=XA\implies BX=XB$$ Then $B=p(A)$ for some $p\in \mathbb{F}[t]$.

If we replace $T_n(\mathbb{F})$ by $M_n(\mathbb{F})$, the question is answered in this paper. Unfortunately, the argument doesn't seem to translate directly, as I can't find a way to force the $M_i$ maps to be upper-triangular.

Update: I have re-asked the question here on MO. Thanks to David E Speyer, we now know that this theorem is false. In particular, if $$A=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0&0&0&1\\ &0&1&0\\ & &0&0\\ & & & 0\end{array}\right]$$ then the matrices commuting with $A$ are those of the form $$\left[\begin{array}{cccc}a&0&*&*\\ &b&*&*\\ & &b&0\\ & & & a\end{array}\right]$$ The matrix $$B=\left[\begin{array}{cccc}0&0&0&1\\ &0&0&0\\ & &0&0\\ & & & 0\end{array}\right]$$ commutes with all matrices of this form, but is clearly not a polynomial in $A$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It is not considered good form to cross post, mathoverflow.net/q/304568/31729 $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jul 10 '18 at 22:49
  • $\begingroup$ And what's your question then? Sounds like you have answered your own question...... $\endgroup$ – Mostafa Ayaz Jul 14 '18 at 18:19
  • $\begingroup$ @copper.hat I am sorry. I did not know that cross-posting was poor form. I will delete this question tomorrow when the bounty ends. (Apparently I can't delete questions with bounties on them.) Thank you for correcting me. $\endgroup$ – Spot Jul 14 '18 at 19:51
  • $\begingroup$ @Spot: Just informing of the site etiquette, not a criticism. I have broken most rules inadvertently (and some knowingly!). $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Jul 14 '18 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ but .. what is the exact meaning of ".. for all X" then ? because the counterexamples you are citing do not involve all the UT matrices , or did I loose something in understanding the statement? $\endgroup$ – G Cab Jul 15 '18 at 21:38

This is a CW post to note that I answered this question on MO. If someone upvotes this answer, the question will be removed from the unanswered list (and, since it is CW, I will not get extra rep).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.