2
$\begingroup$

$G$ is a subgroup of the Euclidean group which translational subgroup $T\triangleleft G$ (the isometries which are pure translations) is a lattice with full rank in Euclidean space. A finite subgroup $H$ of $G$ can not contain pure translations (because the order of a pure translation is infinite). But can a finite subgroup contain isometries with translational components (e.g. glide reflections)?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is your exact notin of "has translational component"? $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 22 '13 at 16:56
  • $\begingroup$ An isometry in the Euclidean group consists of an orthogonal transformation and a translation. If the orthogonal transformation is the identity, then the isometry is a pure translation. If the orthogonal transformation is not the identity, then this is an isometry which either has a translational component or which translational component is zero. So the question was: can an isometry with an orthogonal transformation not the identity and a translational component not zero, be an element of a finite subgroup of $G$. $\endgroup$ – Wox Jan 23 '13 at 9:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ah, in that case you seem to have a distinguished origin in your Euclidean space. In that case, translational components are possible. More precisely, for every finite group there exixts a translation $\tau$ such that all elemnts are of the form $\tau g\tau^{-1}$ with $g$ orthogonal. If you swicth your origin from $O$ to $\tau O$, there is no translational component. $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 23 '13 at 18:17
1
$\begingroup$

Consider the group $\mathbb{Z}\rtimes \langle \tau\rangle$ where $\mathbb{Z}$ represents the group generated by the translation $t:x\rightarrow x+1$ and $\tau$ is the reflection $x\rightarrow -x$. Then the element $t\cdot\tau$ has order 2. Then $\{1,t\cdot\tau\}$ is a finite group of isometries of $\mathbb{R}$ and the element $t\cdot\tau$ has traslational component.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $t\tau$ is also just a reflection ... $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 22 '13 at 16:55
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks!,so, what should be the definition for an isometry of finite order to have translational component? $\endgroup$ – Diego Jan 22 '13 at 17:01
  • $\begingroup$ Great, thanks ! $\endgroup$ – Wox Jan 23 '13 at 10:03
  • $\begingroup$ I found another example in 3D Euclidean space. Consider the isometry $g\in E(3)$ which maps $[x,y,z]\mapsto [y-x,y,-z+\frac{1}{2}]$. The order of $g$ is 2 and $\{1,g\}$ is a finite subgroup. $\endgroup$ – Wox Jan 23 '13 at 10:16
1
$\begingroup$

Let $f$ have finite order $n$. Consider an orbit $x, f(x), f(f(x)),\ldots, f^{(n-1)}(x)$. Then the average $$y=\frac{x+ f(x)+ f(f(x))+\ldots+ f^{(n-1)}(x)}n $$ of these points is a fixed point of $f$. I think an isometry with at least one fixed point does not qualify as having a translational component.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why is the average a fixed point? $\endgroup$ – anon Jan 22 '13 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ @anon Because $f$ is affine and $y$ is an affine combination (sum of coefficients is $1$), so applying $f$ yields $\frac{f(x)+f(f(x))+\ldots f^{(n)}(x)}{n}$. $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 23 '13 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ Well, $f:x\mapsto x+1$ is an affine map on $\bf R$, but $f(a+b)\ne f(a)+f(b)$. Affine doesn't imply linear does it? One would have to assume the "translational" component $b$ in the map $x\mapsto Ax+b$ was zero in order for $f$ to be linear. $\endgroup$ – anon Jan 24 '13 at 3:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.