Let $M$ be a $3$-Riemannian manifold and $\Sigma$ an embedded surface in $M$.

Using the Gauß equation, I want to show the following identity on $\Sigma$: $$R-2\mathrm{Ric}(\nu,\nu)-|A|^2=2K-H^2,$$ where $R$ is the scalar curvature, $\mathrm{Ric}$ is the Ricci tensor, $\nu$ is a unitary vector normal to $\Sigma$, $A$ is the second fundamental form, $K$ and $H$ are the Gauß and mean curvatures of $\Sigma$, respectively.

This appears for example at the beginning of the proof of Proposition 2, here.

Gauß equation: $\langle \overline{\boldsymbol{R}}(X,Y)Z,W\rangle=\langle \boldsymbol{R}(X,Y)Z,W\rangle-\langle A(Y,W),A(X,Z)\rangle+\langle A(X,W),A(Y,Z)\rangle$, where the bold letters $\overline{\boldsymbol{R}},\boldsymbol{R}$ indicates the curvature tensors of $M$ and $\Sigma$, respectively.

What I have tried:

  1. First of all, I was doubtful about the normal vector $\nu$. Since we don't know if $\Sigma$ is orientable, it might be that a (unitary differentiable) normal vector field does not exist on $\Sigma$. However, looking at the definitions, we have (is this really right?) $R(\nu)=R(-\nu)$, $\mathrm{Ric}(\nu,\nu)=\mathrm{Ric}(-\nu,-\nu)$, etc., in such a way that the identity makes sense, regardless the (non)orientability of $\Sigma$.
  2. Then, with the definitions of $R$ and $\mathrm{Ric}(\nu,\nu)$, I tried to work on the term $R-2\mathrm{Ric}(\nu,\nu)$, getting an expression which does not seem to clarify very much...
  3. Then came the next doubt: what is the usual norm for $A$? There are many equivalent ones, right? Generally, this is not important when we talk about continuity, but in the present case, it seems important because we deal with an equation/identity.

I was not able to do much more...

Other useful definitions:

Given an orthonormal basis $\{x_1,x_2,x_3=\nu\}$ of $T_pM$, $p\in \Sigma$, $$\mathrm{Ric}(\nu,\nu)=\frac{1}{2}\big(\langle \overline{\boldsymbol{R}}(\nu,x_1)\nu,x_1\rangle+\langle \overline{\boldsymbol{R}}(\nu,x_2)\nu,x_2\rangle\big)$$ $$R=\frac{1}{3}\sum_{j=1}^3\mathrm{Ric}(x_j,x_j)$$ $$A(X,Y)=\overline{\nabla}_{\overline{X}}\overline{Y}-\nabla_XY.$$


Let's do calculation following your idea (some different notations). $$\operatorname{Ric}(\nu,\nu)=\sum_{i=1}^3<\tilde{R}(e_i,e_3)e_3,e_i>=\sum_{i=1}^2<\tilde{R}(e_i,e_3)e_3,e_i>=\tilde{R}_{1331}+\tilde{R}_{2332}$$ and $$S=\sum_{i,j}^3<\tilde{R}(e_i,e_j)e_j,e_i>=2\sum_{i<j}^3<\tilde{R}(e_i,e_j)e_j,e_i>=2\tilde{R}_{1221}+2\tilde{R}_{1331}+2\tilde{R}_{2332}.$$ Thus \begin{eqnarray*} S-2\operatorname{Ric}(\nu,\nu)&=&2\tilde{R}_{1221}\\&=&2<\tilde{R}(e_1,e_2)e_2,e_1>\\ &=& 2<R(e_1,e_2)e_2,e_1>-2h(e_1,e_1)h(e_2,e_2)+2h^2(e_1,e_2)\\ &=& 2K-2k_1k_2\\ &=& 2K+(k_1^2+k_2^2)-(k_1+k_2)^2\\ &=& 2K+|A|^2-H^2 \end{eqnarray*} where we used the Gussian euqation in the third equation; in the fourth equation we choose $e_1,e_2$ to be the principal direction, i.e. for shape operator $Se_i=k_ie_i$; in the last equation I guess in your context the mean curvature is the sum of principal curvatures instead of half of them.


Thank you for your answer, H-H.

I also did it with help of a friend, so I will also post an answer.

The identity will follow from the Gauß equation: \begin{align*} \langle {\boldsymbol{R}}(X,Y)Z,W\rangle=\langle \boldsymbol{r}(X,Y)Z,W\rangle-\langle A(Y,W),A(X,Z)\rangle+\langle A(X,W),A(Y,Z)\rangle, \end{align*} where, for simplicity's sake, I will use $\boldsymbol{r}$ for the curvature tensor of $\Sigma$ (instead of those $\overline{\boldsymbol{R}}$ and $\boldsymbol{R}$). Let $\{e_1,e_2,\nu\}$ be an orthonormal base for $T_pM$, $p\in \Sigma$ and $\nu\perp \Sigma$. Doing $Y=W=e_1$, $Y=W=e_2$ and summing up the equations, we get \begin{align*} &\langle {\boldsymbol{R}}(X,e_1)Z,e_1\rangle+\langle{\boldsymbol{R}}(X,e_2)Z,e_2\rangle=\langle \boldsymbol{r}(X,e_1)Z,e_1\rangle-\langle A(e_1,e_1),A(X,Z)\rangle\\ &+\langle A(X,e_1),A(e_1,Z)\rangle+ \langle \boldsymbol{r}(X,e_2)Z,e_2\rangle-\langle A(e_2,e_2),A(X,Z)\rangle+\langle A(X,e_2),A(e_2,Z)\rangle. \end{align*}

Denote $A(X,Y)=h(X,Y)\nu$, and therefore $H:=\text{trace}(A)=h(e_1,e_1)+h(e_2,e_2)$. Now, summing to both sides of the equations the term $\langle \boldsymbol{R}(X,\nu)Z,\nu\rangle$, then in the left side we get $\text{trace}(Y\mapsto R(X,Y)Z)=\mathrm{Ric}(X,Z)$. Note that $\langle \boldsymbol{r}(X,e_1)Z,e_1\rangle+\langle \boldsymbol{r}(X,e_2)Z,e_2\rangle=\text{trace}(Y\mapsto \boldsymbol{r}(X,Y)Z)=\mathrm{ric}(X,Z)$. Hence: \begin{align*} \mathrm{Ric}(X,Z)&=\mathrm{ric}(X,Z)-(h(e_1,e_1)+h(e_2,e_2))h(X,Z)+h(X,e_1)h(e_1,Z)\\ &+h(X,e_2)h(e_2,Z)+\langle \boldsymbol{R}(X,\nu)Z,\nu\rangle\\ &=\mathrm{ric}(X,Z)-Hh(X,Z)+\sum_{i=1}^2h(X,e_i)h(e_i,Z)+\langle \boldsymbol{R}(X,\nu)Z,\nu\rangle. \end{align*}

Now, doing $X=Z=e_1$, $X=Z=e_2$ and then summing up, we have \begin{align*} \sum_{j=1}^2\mathrm{Ric}(e_j,e_j)&=\sum_{j=1}^2\mathrm{ric}(e_j,e_j)-H\sum_{j=1}^2h(e_j,e_j)+\sum_{i,j=1}^2h(e_i,e_j)^2+\sum_{j=1}^2\langle \boldsymbol{R}(e_j,\nu)e_j,\nu\rangle\\ &=r-H^2+|A|^2+\sum_{j=1}^2\langle \boldsymbol{R}(\nu,e_j)\nu,e_j\rangle\\ \\ &=r-H^2+|A|^2+\mathrm{Ric}(\nu,\nu). \end{align*} Finally, summing the term $\mathrm{Ric}(\nu,\nu)$ to both sides and using that $r=2K$, we get \begin{align*} R=2K-H^2+|A|^2+2\mathrm{Ric}(\nu,\nu). \end{align*}


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.