0
$\begingroup$

The following is a proof from Appendix C (Linear Spaces Review) of Introduction to Laplace Transforms and Fourier Series, Second Edition, by Phil Dyke:

enter image description here

Should the highlighted part be $v_i$ instead of $u_i$? I don't understand how it could otherwise make sense.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Even worse, there is a typo in the headline: It should be "Gram-Schmidt"! $\endgroup$ – gerw Jul 3 '18 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ @gerw I suggest my students to write just GS in their handouts; I have a collection of about twenty different ways of writing it. In one case the student was of German mother language and she wrote wrongly “Schmidt”. When I asked her, she blushed and told me that her mother's maiden name is Schmidt! Not to mention in how many ways I've seen written Cauchy-Schwarz! $\endgroup$ – egreg Jul 3 '18 at 21:43
2
$\begingroup$

It's written correctly. By "the coefficient of $u_j$ in $u_i$" the author means the coefficient attached to $u_j$ in the equation defining $u_i$; e.g., the equation defining $u_3$ (which appears in the section you pasted into the question) is $u_3 = v_3 -c_2u_2 - c_1u_1$, where $c_2$ is the "coefficient of $u_2$ in $u_3$."

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ahh, I understand now. Thanks for the clarification. $\endgroup$ – The Pointer Jul 3 '18 at 17:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.