I have to calculate the flux of the $$F(x,y,z)=(x+\ln(yz^{2}),y+e^{-(x^{2}+z^{2})},2z)$$ through the cylinder (without its bases): $$\frac{x^{2}}{4}+\frac{y^{2}}{9}=1$$ for $z\in[0,4]$.

I know that if $S_{1}, S_{2}$ are the cylinder bases and $S_{3}$ its "body", then let $$S=S_{1}\cup S_{2}\cup S_{3}$$ so I can apply the divergence theorem in $S$. When I do it, I get: $$\iint \limits_{S} F\;dS=96\pi$$ But I know that $$\iint \limits_{S} F\;dS=\iint \limits_{S_{1}} F\;dS+\iint \limits_{S_{2}} F\;dS+\iint \limits_{S_{3}} F\;dS$$ So, to finish my exercise, I have to evaluate $$\iint \limits_{S_{1}} F\;dS\quad\text{and}\quad\iint \limits_{S_{2}} F\;dS$$ Let $S_{1}$ be parameterized by $$\sigma(r,\theta)=(2r\cos\theta,3r\sin\theta,4)$$ When I use this parameterization to calculate $\iint \limits_{S_{1}} F\;dS$, I get $$\sigma_{r}\times\sigma_{\theta}=(0,0,6)$$ If I use this vector above in the formula of the flux through a surface, I get: $$\iint \limits_{S_{1}} F\;dS=288\pi$$ My question is: my teacher used this parameterization for $S_{1}$: $$\sigma(u,v)=(u,v,4)$$ and then he got $$\iint \limits_{S_{1}} F\;dS=48\pi$$ So, which parameterization should I use? Could he do like that? Just take $(u,v,4)$?


Note that the flux component along $z$ is equal to $0$ for $z=0$ and it is equal to $8$ for $z=4$. Thus the overal flux through the bases is

$$8\cdot A=48 \pi$$

Note that with your first parameterization we obtain the same result, that is

$$\iint \limits_{S_{1}} F\;dS=\int_0^{2\pi}d\theta\int_0^1 (F_x,F_y,8)\cdot (0,0,6r)\,dr=2\pi\cdot 48\cdot[r^2/2]_0^1=48\pi$$

  • $\begingroup$ But shouldn't be $dS$ just $dr d\theta$? $\endgroup$ – mvfs314 Jun 29 '18 at 19:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We have $$\sigma_{r}\times\sigma_{\theta}=(0,0,6r)$$ $\endgroup$ – user Jun 29 '18 at 19:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.