In the book "Gravitation" by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, exercise 1.1 on page 44 reads:

Show that the Gaussian curvature $R$ of the surface of a cylinder is zero by showing that geodesics on that surface (unroll!) suffer no geodesic deviation. Give an independent argument for the same conclusion by employing the formula $R = 1/\rho_1 \rho_2$, where $\rho_1$ and $\rho_2$ are the principal radii of curvature at the point in question with respect to the enveloping Euclidean three-dimensional space.

I completed the first part of the exercise by "unrolling" the cylinder. This gives you a flat surface. Therefore, two initially parallel worldlines will remain parallel and the seperation, $\xi$ will be a non-zero constant:

$$\xi = k$$


$$\frac{\textrm{d}^2 \xi}{\textrm{d}s^2} = 0$$

Now, substituting these values into the "equation of geodesic deviation" (Eqn. 1.6 on pg 30):

$$\frac{\textrm{d}^2 \xi}{\textrm{d}s^2} + R\xi = 0$$

We get:

$$Rk = 0$$

And since $k \neq 0$, then:


However, the problem I have is with the second part: Show that $R=0$ using $R = 1/\rho_1 \rho_2$. To me, it seems like either $\rho_1$ or $\rho_2$ must equal $\infty$ but I'm not sure why.

Is it because, say $\rho_1$ refers to the radius of curvature of the cross-section of the cylinder and $\rho_2$ refers to curvature of the tube itself and so, since it is straight, has an infinite radius? Is this effectively saying a cylinder is a torus with infinite radius?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.