Given trigonometric equation

$$\sin(4x) = \sin(2x)$$

I'm trying to obtain $x$.

Case I)

$$\sin(\pi - 4x) = \sin(2x)$$

$$\pi - 4x = 2x$$

$$\boxed {\dfrac{\pi}{6} = x}$$

Case II)

$$\sin(2\pi - 4x) = \sin(2x)$$

$$2\pi - 4x = 2x$$

$$\boxed {\dfrac{\pi}{3} = x}$$

Is my assumption correct?

  • $\begingroup$ $\sin(\theta) = \sin \phi \implies \theta = \phi + 2 n \pi, n = 0, \pm 1, ...$ $\endgroup$ – jim Jun 28 '18 at 10:18
  • $\begingroup$ What is your assumption? What about $x=0?$ Remember that the functions are periodic, i.e. there are countable solutions. $\endgroup$ – gammatester Jun 28 '18 at 10:20
  • $\begingroup$ case II is peculiar. I would switch it for case 0: $4x=2x$. Further: what is the domain of $x$ here? $\endgroup$ – Vera Jun 28 '18 at 10:20
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Would it not be simpler to use the fact that $\sin(4x)= \sin(2\cdot 2x) = 2\sin(2x)\cos(2x),$ so that $\sin(4x) = \sin(2x) \Leftrightarrow \sin(2x) \left(2\cos(2x) - 1\right) = 0$? $\endgroup$ – MSobak Jun 28 '18 at 10:23

No! $60^{\circ}$ is not a root.

Also, you equation has infinitely many solutions. $$4x=2x+360^{\circ}k,$$ where $k$ is an integer number, which is $$x=180^{\circ}k$$ or $$4x=180^{\circ}-2x+360^{\circ}k,$$ which gives $$x=30^{\circ}+60^{\circ}k$$ and we got the answer: $$\left\{180^{\circ}k,30^{\circ}+60^{\circ}k|k\in\mathbb Z\right\}$$

  • $\begingroup$ Why using degrees (I dislike them) if in the question radials are used? $\endgroup$ – Vera Jun 28 '18 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Vera I just like degrees. Here it's the same. If you want you can fixed it. $\endgroup$ – Michael Rozenberg Jun 28 '18 at 13:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for explanation and giving me the liberty. I choose to respect your likes and will not fix. $\endgroup$ – Vera Jun 28 '18 at 13:18

Change the form of $\sin(4x)=\sin(2x)$ to get $2\sin(2x)\cos(2x)=\sin(2x)$

If $\sin(2x)=0$, $2x=n \pi$ and $x=\frac{n \pi}{2}.$ Where $n$ is an integer.
If $\sin(2x) \neq 0,$ $\cos(2x)=\frac{1}{2}$ $\space$ $2x=2m\pi\pm\frac{\pi}{3}$ $\space$ $x=m\pi\pm\frac{\pi}{6}.$ Where $m$ is an integer.



Your second case is clearly not true, for if $x=\frac{\pi}{3}$




so this counter-example disproves your conjecture ... for all you actually asked was "Is my assumption correct?"


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.