I'm doing some excercise in Lee's book. I've come up with a solution but not really sure. I also want to see other people solutions too. Here is the problem:
Let $X$ be any topological space and $CX$ is the cone $(X \times I)/(X \times \{1\})$. Show that $CX$ is locally (path-)connected $\Leftrightarrow$ $X$ is.
Note : I'm aware of the answer here that use the fact that quotient space of a locally (path-)connected space is locally (path-)connected. But since in Lee's book does not prove this fact (it's even not in the problem), i think i should solve this problem by constructing explicit connected basis for $CX$ and $X$. Forgive me for my silly reason.
I think i can handle the $\Rightarrow$ part. But i stuck for $\Leftarrow$ part. Can anyone suggest a hint for me to do this ? Or any solution without construct a basis for $CX$ ? Thank you.
$\textbf{Edit :}$
I know that if i can construct a neighbourhood basis for vertex of $CX$, then the problem solved. I have two ideas:
1). First, suppose $(B_{\alpha})_{\alpha \in A}$ is the connected basis for $X$, then for each $\alpha$, define the set $$ T_{\alpha} = \{ B_{\alpha} \times (t,1] \mid \text{ for all } 0\leq t < 1\} $$ the elements are connected open subset of $X \times I$. Now, take (not empty) one element for each $T_\alpha$, say $B_{\alpha} \times (t_{\alpha},1]$, and then take their union $\bigcup_{\alpha \in A} B_{\alpha} \times (t_{\alpha},1]$. Then define a set $\mathcal{U}$ as the collection of all of these possible union. Each of these union is an open subset in $X \times I$ contain $X \times \{0\}$. The image of these collection under quotient map $q$, denoted by $\mathcal{B}$, is then a collection of connected neighbourhoods of the vertex.
is $\mathcal{B}$ is a well-defined neighbourhood basis for the vertex ?
2). I have shown that $CX$ is contractible and path-connected. But how can i use this fact to construct a neighbourhood basis for the vertex ?
I hope someone would help me with this. I've stuck here for days (felt so embarrased). I'am self studying and don't have anyone here to talk about topology. Thank you.