3
$\begingroup$

In my work, I encountered the following optimization problem.

Given symmetric, positive definite matrices $K_1, K_2, \dots, K_n$, find symmetric, positive definite matrix $R$ that minimizes

$$\max \{ |1-\alpha_{\max}|, |1-\alpha_{\min}| \}$$

where $\alpha_{\min}$ and $\alpha_{\max}$ are the minimal and maximal eigenvalues of $K_1 R, K_2 R, \dots, K_n R$.

Are there any explicit solutions for this problem? If not, are there any numerical algorithms?

Thanks in advance.


Edit 1: Now, I am looking for a numerical solution based on the gradient descent technique. The eigenvalues of $K_1 R, K_2 R, \dots, K_n R$ are the same as the symmetric tensors $S_1=\sqrt{R}K_1 \sqrt{R}, S_2=\sqrt{R}K_2 \sqrt{R}, \dots, S_n=\sqrt{R}K_n \sqrt{R}$. The derivatives of eigen value $\alpha$ with respect to the original Hermitian matrix $S_i$ is available in the link Derivatives of eigenvalues.

Shortly we have $\partial \alpha/\partial S_i=v\otimes v$ where $v$ is the asociated eigen vector. The remaining work is to find $\partial S_i/\partial R$. Are there explicit expressions for $\partial S_i/\partial R$ or $\partial \sqrt{R}/\partial R$?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm. This seems a very challenging problem, as the eigenvalues of $K_iR$ have no simple relationship to those of $K_i$ or $R$... even the case where $R$ is diagonal seems very tough. $\endgroup$
    – user7530
    Commented Jun 22, 2018 at 8:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This looks like a research-level question. Why not move it to MathOverflow? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 7, 2018 at 12:35

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

Let us consider the simplest case, i.e., the case where $n=1$. Rephrasing slightly:

Given symmetric and positive definite $\rm A$, find symmetric and positive definite $\rm X$ that minimizes

$$\max \big\{ | 1 - \lambda_{\max} (\mathrm A \mathrm X) |, | 1 - \lambda_{\min} (\mathrm A \mathrm X) | \big\}$$

Note that

$$\begin{aligned} \max \big\{ | 1 - \lambda_{\max} (\mathrm A \mathrm X) |, | 1 - \lambda_{\min} (\mathrm A \mathrm X) | \big\} &= \max \big\{ | \lambda_{\min} (\mathrm I - \mathrm A \mathrm X) |, | \lambda_{\max} (\mathrm I - \mathrm A \mathrm X) | \big\}\\ &= \max \big\{ \big| \lambda_{\min} \big( \mathrm I - \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \mathrm X \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \big) \big|, \big| \lambda_{\max} \big( \mathrm I - \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \mathrm X \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \big) \big| \big\}\\ &= \rho \left( \mathrm I - \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \mathrm X \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \right) = \left\| \mathrm I - \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \mathrm X \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \right\|_2 = \left\| \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \mathrm X \mathrm A^{\frac 12} - \mathrm I\right\|_2\end{aligned}$$

Replacing the constraint $\mathrm X \succ \mathrm O$ (positive definite) with $\mathrm X \succeq \mathrm O$ (positive semidefinite), we obtain the following convex optimization problem

$$\begin{array}{ll} \text{minimize} & \left\| \mathrm A^{\frac 12} \mathrm X \mathrm A^{\frac 12} - \mathrm I\right\|_2\\ \text{subject to} & \mathrm X \succeq \mathrm O\end{array}$$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your comments. During the last few days and after some manipulation, I arrive at the same result as Rodrigo. It is indeed a simple and elegant result. It is a research question on the optimization of Neumann series. I was not aware the difference between the two web site MathOverflow and stackexchange when posting this. However, since I am a physicist and mechanician, I can not judge the level of difficulty of the question in the mathematic community.. $\endgroup$
    – Q.-D. To
    Commented Jul 9, 2018 at 8:09
  • $\begingroup$ Due to the non existing problem of derivatives of eigen values, I have now switched to gradient free methods for optimization. It seems working. $\endgroup$
    – Q.-D. To
    Commented Jul 9, 2018 at 8:18
  • $\begingroup$ Which exact problem are you solving? I assume you're dealing with $n > 1$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 9, 2018 at 8:22
  • $\begingroup$ I am dealing with solution of periodic anisotropic heterogeneous conduction problem in the homogenization context using FFT methods. The method is based on the iterative scheme. To achieve the best convergence rate, I have to estimate the spectral radius and minimize it. Currently, I am writing a paper on this. If you are interested, I send you the manuscript when finished. $\endgroup$
    – Q.-D. To
    Commented Jul 13, 2018 at 9:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Q.-D.To Will the paper be uploaded to arXiv or the like? If so, please consider posting the link here so I can take a look. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2018 at 18:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .