The following notations and definitions are taken from Richard Stanley's book Enumerative Combinatorics Volume $1,$ second edition.

Recall that a formal power series $F(x)$ is of the form $$\sum_{n\geq 0} a_n x^n$$ where $x$ cannot take numerical value.

If $F_1(x), F_2(x),...$ is a sequence of formal power series, and if $F(x) = \sum_{n\geq 0}a_n x^n$ then we say that $F_i(x)$ converges to $F(x)$ as $i\to\infty$ provided for every $n\geq 0,$ there is a number $\delta(n)$ such that the coefficient of $x^n$ in $F_i(x)$ is $a^n$ whenever $I\geq \delta(n).$

The degree of a nonzero formal power series $F(x) = \sum_{n\geq 0}a_nx^n$ is the least integer $n$ such that $a_n\neq 0.$ It is denoted by $deg(F(x)).$

Statement: $F_i(x)$ converges if and only if $$\lim_{i\to\infty}deg(F_{i+1}(x)- F_i(x))=\infty.$$

If all $F_i(x) = F(x),$ wouldn't the statement false? Because $F(x), F(x),...$ clearly converges to $F(x)$ but $$\lim_{i\to\infty}deg(F(x)-F(x)) = 0 \neq \infty.$$ If we assume that all $F_i(x)$ are distinct from $F(x),$ then I do not know how to prove the statement.

  • $\begingroup$ What is the degree of the zero power series by definition? $\endgroup$ – dan_fulea Jun 21 '18 at 22:52
  • $\begingroup$ Undefined? So my example is false? $\endgroup$ – Idonknow Jun 21 '18 at 22:55
  • $\begingroup$ The above definition should be correspondingly be adapted. There is no least integer, just set it to $\deg 0 =\infty$. Then there is not counterexample using the constant sequence $F,F,F,\dots$ . $\endgroup$ – dan_fulea Jun 21 '18 at 22:57

Suppose that $\text{deg}(F_{i+1}-F_{i})\to \infty$. So, given $m$, there exists $N$ such that $i\ge N$ implies that $\text{deg}(F_{i+1}-F_{i})>m$. So $[x^m]F_{i}=[x^m]F_{i+1}$, so the coefficent of $x^m$ stabilizes as required.

Now suppose that $F_{i}\to F$. Let $m$ be given. Since $F_{i}\to F$, there exists an $M$ such that $i\geq M$ implies that $[x^{k}]F_{i}=[x^{k}]F_{i+1}$ for $k=0, 1,\dotsc, m$. Then $\deg (F_{i+1}-F_{i})>m$ as desired.

  • $\begingroup$ I assume that the $m$ in second paragraph refers to natural number, right? $\endgroup$ – Idonknow Jun 22 '18 at 1:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.