$$\mathcal E = \{A \in \mathcal M(n \times n; \mathbb C): \|A\|_2 \le \|A_0\|_2\}$$

where $A_0 $ is some fixed matrix and $\|\cdot\|_2$ denotes the induced $2$-norm. We also have for every $A \in \mathcal E$, $\rho(A)< 1$ where $\rho(\cdot)$ denotes the spectral radius and $\rho(A_0) < 1$. Is it possible to give an upper bound $C$ in terms of $\|A_0\|_2$ such that $\|(I-A)^{-1}\|_2 \le C$ for all $A \in \mathcal E$?

  • $\begingroup$ Notably, $\mathcal E$ is compact. So, there necessarily exists a stronger upper bound $r < 1$ such that $\rho(A) \leq r$ for all $A \in \mathcal E$. $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jun 21 '18 at 22:40
  • $\begingroup$ Does $\|A\|_2$ denote the Frobenius norm or the induced 2-norm? $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jun 21 '18 at 22:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Omnomnomnom: It is induced $2$-norm. $\endgroup$ – user1101010 Jun 21 '18 at 22:42

The answer is yes. The upper bound I come up with below is $\frac{1}{1 - \|A_0\|_2}$.

It doesn't seem like there's any need to consider the matrix $A_0$ itself. In the below, we will take $M = \|A\|_0 \geq 0$, since no other information about $A_0$ will be used.

Suppose that $M \geq 1$. Then $\mathcal E$ includes the identity matrix, and so we fail to have $\rho(A) < 1$.

Suppose that $M < 1$. We note that $$ \|(I-A)^{-1}\|_2 = \left\|\sum_{k=0}^\infty A^k\right\|_2 \leq \sum_{k=0}^\infty \left\|A^k\right\|_2 \leq \sum_{k=0}^\infty \left\|A\right\|_2^k \leq \sum_{k=0}^\infty M^k = \frac{1}{1 - M} $$

  • $\begingroup$ This answer simplifies to the simplest answer to the question: Yes! (Sorry, couldn't help myself.) $\endgroup$ – Robert van de Geijn Jun 21 '18 at 22:50
  • $\begingroup$ @ulaff.net I agree that any answer to a well formed yes/no question should include either a yes or a no; I've edited accordingly. $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jun 21 '18 at 22:53
  • $\begingroup$ @Omnomnomnom: Thanks. I realized I formulated my question in a wrong way. Indeed, the family of interest is for the case $M > 1$ and the family $\mathcal E = \{A \in \mathcal M(n \times n; \mathbb C): \|A\|_2 \le M \text{ and } \rho(A) < 1\}$. Anyway, your answer does addresses the question I asked. $\endgroup$ – user1101010 Jun 21 '18 at 22:59
  • $\begingroup$ @iris2017 you should make a new post with the correctly formulated question, if you haven't done so already $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jun 21 '18 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ @iris2017 also, I'm fairly confident that you'll only get the upper bound you want if you define your family as $$ \mathcal E = \{A : \|A\|_2 \leq M \text{ and } \rho(A) \leq r\} $$ for some fixed $r$ with $0 \leq r < 1$. For this set, it is notable that an upper bound must exist since $\mathcal E$ is compact and the inverse function is continuous. $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jun 21 '18 at 23:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.