3
$\begingroup$

I'm having trouble with the proof of the following fact.

Let $E,F,G$ be Banach spaces. Suppose $X$ is open in $E$ and $Y$ is open in $F$. Given functions $f\in C^m(X,F)$, $g\in C^m(Y,G)$ such that $f(X)\subseteq Y$. Then $g\circ f\in C^m(X,G)$.

Here $C^m$ means $m$-times Fréchet differentiable. We write $\mathcal{L}(E,F)$ for the space of bounded linear operators from $E$ to $F$.

My book (Amann & Escher, Analysis II, p.185) says the proof is induction on $m$ and left as an exercise. While I understand that $\partial(g\circ f)(x_0)=\partial g(f(x_0))\partial f(x_0)$, I got stuck for the case $m\geq2$. Here are my thoughts.

So $\partial(g\circ f):X\to\mathcal{L}(E,G)$ is the composition of $(\partial g)\circ f$ and $\partial f$, where $X\xrightarrow{f}F\xrightarrow{\partial g}\mathcal{L}(F,G)$ and $X\xrightarrow{\partial f}\mathcal{L}(E,F)$. However, this does not mean $\partial(g\circ f)=(\partial g)\circ f\circ\partial f$, because the composition of $(\partial g)\circ f$ and $\partial f$ is actually the composition of the values of these functions. So we shall write $\partial(g\circ f)=\big((\partial g)\circ f\big)(\partial f)$. We can decompose the map like this:\begin{matrix}X&\xrightarrow{\varphi}&\mathcal{L}(E,F)\times\mathcal{L}(F,G)&\xrightarrow{\psi}&\mathcal{L}(E,G)\\x_0&\mapsto&(\partial f(x_0),\partial g(f(x_0)))&\mapsto&\partial g(f(x_0))\partial f(x_0)\end{matrix} By assumption the map $x_0\mapsto\partial f(x_0)$ belongs to $C^{m-1}(X,\mathcal{L}(E,F))$. By induction the map $x_0\mapsto\partial g(f(x_0))$, being a composition of $\partial g$ and $f$, both of which are $C^{m-1}$, belongs to $C^{m-1}(X,\mathcal{L}(F,G))$. Hence $\varphi\in C^{m-1}(X,\mathcal{L}(E,F)\times\mathcal{L}(F,G))$. It suffices to show that $\psi\in C^{m-1}(\mathcal{L}(E,F)\times\mathcal{L}(F,G),\mathcal{L}(F,G))$, and then induction completes the proof.

But how do I show that $\psi\in C^{m-1}(\mathcal{L}(E,F)\times\mathcal{L}(F,G),\mathcal{L}(F,G))$? And are there other proofs?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Notice $\psi$ is just the product of linear functions $(A, B) \mapsto A \circ B$ hence is infinitely differentiable (even analytic).

(You probably already know bilinear continuous functions are infinitely differentiable.)

Theorem. Any multilinear continuous function $u:E_1 \times \ldots \times E_r \to F$ is indefinitely differentiable.

Abridged proof. $$u(x_1 + h_1, \ldots, x_r + h_r) - u(x_1, \ldots, x_r) - \sum_{i = 1}^r u(x_1, \ldots, h_i, \ldots, x_r) = \sum u(y_1, \ldots, y_r)$$ where the $(y_1, \ldots, y_r)$ are vectors such that at least two entries are of the form $h_i.$ The right hand side is $o(\|h_1\| + \ldots + \|h_r\|) = o(\|(h_1, \ldots, h_r)\|).$ Hence $$u'(x_1, \ldots, x_r) \cdot (h_1, \ldots, h_r) = \sum_{i = 1}^r u(x_1, \ldots, h_i, \ldots, x_r).$$

Define now $e_i$ to be the canonical inclusion $E_i \mapsto E_1 \times \ldots \times E_r.$ So $u'(x_1, \ldots, x_r) = \sum_{i = 1}^r u(x_1, \ldots, e_i, \ldots, x_r)$ and the function in the right is the sum of $r$ multilinear functions (in $r - 1$ variables). By induction, we are done.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I did note that this function is bilinear (after I posted this question), and my book has an exercise stating that a continuous $n$-linear map $A$ is infinitely differentiable with $\partial^{n+1}A=0$. However, the problem is that I don't know how to prove this. Could you please include a proof of this fact in your answer? Thanks in advance! $\endgroup$ – Colescu Jun 23 '18 at 0:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.