# "Scaled $L^p$ norm" and geometric mean

The $L^p$ norm in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is \begin{align} \|x\|_p = \left(\sum_{j=1}^{n} |x_j|^p\right)^{1/p}. \end{align} Playing around with WolframAlpha, I noticed that, if we define the "scaled" $L^p$ norm in $\mathbb{R}^n$ to be

\begin{align} \| x \|_p = \left(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n} |x_j|^p\right)^{1/p} \end{align} then \begin{align} \lim_{p \to 0} \|x\|_p &= \left( \prod_{j=1}^{n} |x_j| \right)^{1/n}, \end{align} which is the geometric mean of the coordinates' absolute values. This is interesting maybe because the $L^p$ norm doesn't have a nice limit at zero.

My questions:

1. How do I prove this?
2. Is this definition of "scaled $L^p$ norm" interesting, or known by another name, or used anywhere?
3. Is there any interesting reason to define the $L^0$ norm as the geometric mean, as above?

Thanks!

I'll prove the general case in which $\mu$ is a positive measure on a space $X$ and $\mu(X) = 1$. Assuming that $\|f\|_q < \infty$ for at least one $0 < q < 1$, we have $$\lim_{p \to 0} \|f\|_{p} = \exp\left(\int_X \log|f| \,d\mu\right).$$

Your particular case follows by setting $X = \{1, \ldots, n\}$ and $\mu(i) = 1/n$.

By definition $$\|f\|_p = \left\{\int_X |f|^p \,d\mu\right\}^{1/p}.$$

Lemma 1: If $0 < r < s < 1$, then $\|f\|_r \le \|f\|_s$.

Proof: $\varphi(x) = x^{s/r}$ is a convex function. Apply Jensen's inequality to $\int_X |f|^r \,d\mu$ to get $$\left\{\int_X |f|^r \,d\mu\right\}^{s/r} \le \int_X |f|^s \,d\mu.$$

Hence $\|f\|_r \le \|f\|_s$.

Lemma 2: If $0 < p < 1$, then $\int_X \log|f| \,d\mu \le \log \|f\|_p$.

Proof: $\log$ is a concave function. Apply Jensen's inequality to $\int_X |f|^p \,d\mu$ to get the desired inequality.

From lemmas 1 and 2, it follows that $\log\|f\|_{1/n}$ is decreasing and bounded from below. Therefore, it converges as $n \to \infty$.

To find the limit, apply the inequality $\log a \le n(a^{1/n} - 1)$ with $a = \left\{\int_X |f|^{1/n}\,d\mu\right\}^{n}$ to get $$\log \|f\|_{1/n} \le \int_X \frac{|f|^{1/n} - 1}{1/n} \,d\mu. \tag{1}$$

Use L'Hôpital's rule to obtain $$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{a^x - 1}{x} = \log a.$$

Take the limit of (1) as $n \to \infty$. Since $\dfrac{|f|^{1/n} - 1}{1/n}$ is dominated by the integrable function $\dfrac{|f|^{q} - 1}{q}$ for large enough $n$ and the value of $q$ stated in the assumptions, apply the dominated convergence theorem to get $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \log \|f\|_{1/n} \le \int_X \log|f| \,d\mu.$$

Apply the squeeze theorem with lemma 2 to obtain $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \log \|f\|_{1/n} = \int_X \log|f| \,d\mu.$$

Since $\log$ is continuous, we conclude $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \|f\|_{1/n} = \exp\left(\int_X \log|f| \,d\mu\right).$$

The above argument applies to any sequence $s_n$ that converges to $0$, not just $1/n$. The general result stated at the beginning now follows. This is a standard argument in measure theory. It is usually used to apply the dominated convergence theorem to general limits, not just limits of countable sequences.

To answer your other questions, the "scaled norm" follows from the general case as I explained at the beginning of my answer. I've never seen the geometric mean called $L^0$. As for further readings, check out Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis or Folland's Real Analysis. The above is an exercise in one of them (I think the former).

• @ Ayman Hourieh ,in inequality $(1)$ , you are taking the limit as $n \to \infty$ & using D.C.T , you are passing the limit within the integral in the Right hand Side. But it is not clear to me that; to pass the limit you must have $|\frac {|f|^{1/n}-1}{1/n}| \le g(x)$ for some $g(x) \in L^{1}$. So, here what is the dominating function?? Apr 21, 2014 at 9:28
• @user92360 Study the function $x \mapsto \dfrac{|f|^x - 1}{x}$ as a whole. It is decreasing as $x \to 0$. Apr 21, 2014 at 17:54
• @AymanHourieh , You are correct when you write that the function $s \mapsto \frac{a^s -1}{s}$ is increasing for $s\in(0,q]$ (decreasing as $s \to 0$). HOWEVER, if $a<1$, the function has negative values and then, in this case, $s \mapsto \left\vert \frac{a^s -1}{s}\right\vert$ is decreasing for $s\in(0,q]$ (incrasing as $s \to 0$). So, if $\vert f \vert <1$, your argument to apply the Dominated Convergence Theorem fails. Nov 19, 2015 at 17:04
• @AymanHourieh , A nice suggestion (from @dreammonger) to fix your proof is to use the Dominated Convergence Theorem for $\frac{\vert f\vert^{1/n}-1}{1/n}$ on the set $\{x : \vert f(x)\vert \geqslant 1\}$ and the Monotone Convergence Theorem for $\frac{1-\vert f\vert^{1/n}}{1/n}$ on the set $\{x : \vert f(x)\vert < 1\}$. Nov 19, 2015 at 17:16
• @AnlamK We can also show this by computing derivatives. Let $f(x)=(a^x-1)/x$, then $$f'(x)=\frac{a^x(\log (a)x-1)+1}{x^2}.$$ It suffices to show that $a^x(\log(a)x-1)+1$ is always non-negative. Let $g(x)=a^x(\log(a) x-1)+1$, then $g'(x)=a^x(\log (a))^2x$. Thus $g(x)$ attains its minimum at $x=0$ which is $0$, so $g(x)\geq 0$. Sep 24, 2017 at 17:23

Scaled $L^p$ norm (or rather $\ell^p$, since you work with vectors) is known as Generalized mean. A bunch of interesting inequalities involving the means are found in the book Inequalities by Hardy, Littlewood, and Pólya.

The integral geometric mean $\exp\left(\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} \log f(\theta)\,d\theta \right)$ comes up in complex analysis, especially as it relates to operator theory and involves the name of Gabor Szegő. See the terse Wikipedia article on Szegő limit theorems and the not-at-all-terse book by Barry Simon Szego's Theorem and Its Descendants

In a visit back to his native Budapest, Pólya mentioned this conjecture to Szegő, then an undergraduate, and he proved the theorem below, published in 1915... At the time, Szegő was nineteen, and when the paper was published, he was serving in the Austrian Army in World War I

The book Banach spaces of analytic functions by Kenneth Hoffman presents this topic from the viewpoint of complex analysis without much operator theory. The quantity $\exp\left(\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} \log f(\theta)\,d\theta \right)$ turns out to be equal to $\inf_{p}\int|1-p|^2 f(\theta)\,d\theta$ where $p$ runs over all polynomials vanishing at $0$. In particular, this gives a criterion for the density of polynomials in weighted $L^2$ spaces.

In a rather different direction, the integral geometric mean comes up in number theory. If $p$ a complex polynomial, the quantity $\exp\left(\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} \log |p(\theta)|\,d\theta \right)$ is called the Mahler measure of $p$, denoted $M(p)$. Lehmer's conjecture asserts that there is a gap $(1,\mu)$ in the possible values of $M(p)$: that is, either $M(p)=1$ or $M(p)\ge \mu>1$. Conjecturally, $\mu$ is attained by the polynomial $$p(z)= z^{10}-z^9+z^7-z^6+z^5-z^4+z^3-z+1$$ But even the existence of such $\mu$ remains unknown, let alone its precise value. The Wikipedia article has a good list of references.

That said, please do not call the integral geometric mean "the $L^0$ norm". This term is ambiguous and misleading enough as it is.