This question from Allan Clark's "Elements of Abstract Algebra"

Show that an extension of degree 2 is Galois except possibly when the characteristic is 2. What is the case when the characteristic is 2?

Tips are helpful, a solution is ideal.


  • 3
    $\begingroup$ (in characteristic $2$) If $a$ is not a square in $F$ then $x^2-a = (x+\sqrt{a})^2$ is irreducible and $F(\sqrt{a})/F$ is inseparable. Now $\mathbb{F}_4 = \mathbb{F}_2[x]/(x^2+x+1) = \mathbb{F}_2(\zeta_3)$ is Galois of degree $2$, so some degree $2$ extensions are Galois, some other are not. $\endgroup$ – reuns Aug 12 '17 at 16:08
  • $\begingroup$ @reuns In characteristic 2, is it possible to find an element which is not a square? $\endgroup$ – roi_saumon Oct 21 '18 at 14:28

Let $L/K$ be a field extension of degree $2$. If $\alpha \in L \setminus K$ then $p(t)=\min_K(\alpha,t)$ has degree $2$. In particular $p(t)$ must split over $L$ since $p(t)=(x-\alpha)q(t)$, forcing $q(t)$ to be degree $1$. If the characteristic of $K$ is not equal to $2$ then $p^\prime(t) \neq 0$, so $\alpha$ is separable over $L$. Thereby $L/K$ is Galois.

For a counterexample in the case of characteristic $2$ consider the splitting field of $p(x)=x^2-t \in \mathbb F_2(t)$. It's not hard to see that $p(x)=(x+\sqrt{t})^2$ so the extension is purely inseparable and not Galois.


You can also use Galois theory to prove the statement. Suppose $K/F$ is an extension of degree $2$. In particular, it is finite and $char(F) \neq 2$ implies that it is separable (every $\alpha \in K/F$ has minimal polynomial of degree $2$ whose derivative is non-zero).

We know that if $K/F$ is finite and separable, there exist a Galois closure of $K/F$, that is, a field $E$ containing $K$ such that $E/F$ is Galois (see below for a proof of this theorem).

The field inclusions I will use are $F \subseteq K \subseteq E$.

Let $E$ be a Galois closure of $K$ over $F$ and let $H \le G=Gal(E/F)$ be the subgroup corresponding to $K$ (the group that fixes $K$ pointwise). By the fundamental theorem of Galois theory, we know that the index of $H$ in $G$, $[G:H]$, equals the degree of the extension $K/F$, i.e. the degree of the fixed field of $H$ over the base field.

But, $[K:F]=2$ by hypothesis, so our $H$, being of index $2$ is normal in $G$. Again, Galois theory tells us that $K/F$ is Galois.

It remains to prove that for every finite and separable extension $K/F$ there exist a Galois closure of $K$ over $F$.

Let $\alpha_1, \alpha_2, ... , \alpha_n$ be a basis of $E$ considered as a vector space over $F$ and let $p_i(X) \in F[X]$ be the minimal polynomial of $\alpha_i$ over $F$, $1\le i \le n$. By hypothesis, $K/F$ is separable, so the minimal polynomials $p_i(X)$ are all separable. If we denote by $K_i$ the splitting field of $p_i(X)$ over $F$, then $K_i/F$ will be a Galois extension (as the splitting field of a separable polynomial). Since every $K_i/F$ is Galois, the composite $K_1K_2 \cdots K_n/F$ is also Galois which contains $K$ and proves the existence. Note that by taking the intersection of all Galois extensions of $F$ containing $K$, we can obtain a minimal Galois extension $E_{min}$ in the sense that every Galois extension of $F$ containing $K$ contains $E_{min}$. When we say the Galois closure of $K$ over $F$, we actually refer to this minimal Galois extension.

Of course, in your question, the Galois closure $E$ is actually $K$ itself and $H$ is the trivial subgroup, but we didn't know it a priori.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.